activity
20242026
most citedLLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods

38 citations · 48 across the 27 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2024★ 38 cited

LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods

Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen +5

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has driven their expanding application across various fields. One of the most promising applications is their role as evaluato…

cs.CL2024

CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-Judges

Haitao Li, Junjie Chen, Qingyao Ai +4

The use of large language models (LLMs) as automated evaluation tools to assess the quality of generated natural language, known as LLMs-as-Judges, has demonstrated promising capab…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Beyond Scalar Reward Model: Learning Generative Judge from Preference Data

Ziyi Ye, Xiangsheng Li, Qiuchi Li +5

Learning from preference feedback is a common practice for aligning large language models~(LLMs) with human value. Conventionally, preference data is learned and encoded into a sca…

cs.CL2024

Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation

Junjie Chen, Weihang Su, Zhumin Chu +9

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has highlighted the need for efficient and reliable methods to evaluate their performance. Traditional evaluation methods ofte…

cs.CL2024★ 4 cited

Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language Models

Weihang Su, Changyue Wang, Qingyao Ai +4

Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) refer to the phenomenon of LLMs producing responses that are coherent yet factually inaccurate. This issue undermines the effectivene…