activity
20242026
most citedLLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods

38 citations · 48 across the 27 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

EnGRICH: Enhancing Generative Reward Modeling with Critiques from Humans

Xuancheng Li, Beining Wang, Haitao Li +7

Generative reward models (GRMs) are important for LLM optimization. Unlike scalar reward models, GRMs generate natural-language critiques alongside preference judgments, providing…

cs.AI2026

Different Feedback, Different Updates: Selective Self-Learning from User Interactions for Large Language Models

Xuancheng Li, Xuanchen Li, Haitao Li +6

User feedback offers natural supervision for persistent LLM improvement, but a single message may support multiple behavioral changes with different scopes of generalization. We in…

cs.AI2026

How do Humans Process AI-generated Hallucination Contents: a Neuroimaging Study

Shuqi Zhu, Yi Zhong, Ziyi Ye +4

While AI-generated hallucinations pose considerable risks, the underlying cognitive mechanisms by which humans can successfully recognize or be misled by these hallucinations remai…

cs.AI2026

MulFeRL: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Verbal Feedback in a Multi-turn Loop

Xuancheng Li, Haitao Li, Yujia Zhou +2

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is widely used to improve reasoning across domains, but outcome-only scalar rewards are often sparse and uninformative. This l…

cs.AI2025

From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization

Beining Wang, Weihang Su, Hongtao Tian +5

Improving the multi-step reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical yet challenging task. The dominant paradigm, outcome-supervised reinforcement learning (RLV…