9 citations · 12 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
Difficulties with Evaluating a Deception Detector for AIs
Lewis Smith, Bilal Chughtai, Neel Nanda
Building reliable deception detectors for AI systems -- methods that could predict when an AI system is being strategically deceptive without necessarily requiring behavioural evid…
Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes
Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Bilal Chughtai, Stefan Heimersheim +1
AI models might use deceptive strategies as part of scheming or misaligned behaviour. Monitoring outputs alone is insufficient, since the AI might produce seemingly benign outputs…
Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilities
Zora Che, Stephen Casper, Robert Kirk +12
Evaluations of large language model (LLM) risks and capabilities are increasingly being incorporated into AI risk management and governance frameworks. Currently, most risk evaluat…
Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability
Lee Sharkey, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Batson +26
Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities in order to accomplish concrete scientific and engineering goa…
Towards evaluations-based safety cases for AI scheming
Mikita Balesni, Marius Hobbhahn, David Lindner +13
We sketch how developers of frontier AI systems could construct a structured rationale -- a 'safety case' -- that an AI system is unlikely to cause catastrophic outcomes through sc…