activity
20242026
most citedImproving Automated Code Reviews: Learning from Experience

11 citations · 28 across the 14 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2026Show all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.SE2026

Is Agentic Code Review Helpful? Mining Developers' Feedback to CodeRabbit Reviews in the Wild

Hong Yi Lin, Mingzhao Liang, Patanamon Thongtanunam +1

Agentic code review, where autonomous agents provide code review comments on pull requests, is increasingly integrated into development workflows, yet there is limited empirical ev…

cs.SE2026

Agentic Code Review in the Terminal: A Trajectory-Level Analysis of Behavior, Cost, and Human-Alignment

Wachiraphan Charoenwet, Kla Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam +3

Agentic code review in terminal-based environments enables early feedback during local development before pull request creation. However, existing evaluations remain performance-ce…

cs.SE2026

From Registry to Repository: How AI Agent Skills Are Written, Adapted, and Maintained

Haoyu Gao, Jai Lal Lulla, Hong Yi Lin +3

AI coding agents increasingly rely on skills: structured context bundles, typically a SKILLmd file with a YAML header and Markdown body, loaded on demand for domain knowledge, w…

cs.CR2026

AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection

Wachiraphan Charoenwet, Kla Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam +3

Secure code review is critical during pre-integration, where Atlassian developers rely on lightweight analysis tools, while deep security assessment is deferred to later stages, de…

cs.SE2026

HalluJudge: A Reference-Free Hallucination Detection for Context Misalignment in Code Review Automation

Kla Tantithamthavorn, Hong Yi Lin, Patanamon Thongtanunam +3

Large Language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in code review automation, such as review comment generation, yet they suffer from hallucinations -- where the generated…