activity
20232026
most citedRisks of AI Scientists: Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy

14 citations · 70 across the 73 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

53 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Small Language Models as Judges for Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning

Fengyu Xie, Yilun Zhao, Bingsen Chen +2

Rubric-based reinforcement learning extends RL beyond tasks with exact answers or rule-based verifiers by scoring responses against instance-specific criteria. However, this makes…

cs.CL2026

Measuring the Gap Between Human and LLM Research Ideas

Ziyu Chen, Yilun Zhao, Arman Cohan

LLMs are increasingly used to brainstorm research ideas, but existing evaluations mostly judge individual ideas by novelty, feasibility, or expert preference. We instead ask: how f…

cs.CL2026

Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems

Yilun Zhao, Jinbiao Wei, Tingyu Song +3

Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity. This capability is increasingly important…

cs.CL2026

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future

Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao +5

Peer review is a multi-stage process involving reviews, rebuttals, meta-reviews, final decisions, and subsequent manuscript revisions. Recent advances in large language models (LLM…

cs.CL2026

RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation

Sihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao +4

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used across the scientific workflow, including to draft peer-review reports. However, many AI-generated reviews are superficial and in…

cs.CL2026★ 4 cited

MedTutor: A Retrieval-Augmented LLM System for Case-Based Medical Education

Dongsuk Jang, Ziyao Shangguan, Kyle Tegtmeyer +4

The learning process for medical residents presents significant challenges, demanding both the ability to interpret complex case reports and the rapid acquisition of accurate medic…

cs.CL2026

Patient-Similarity Cohort Reasoning in Clinical Text-to-SQL

Yifei Shen, Yilun Zhao, Justice Ou +2

Real-world clinical text-to-SQL requires reasoning over heterogeneous EHR tables, temporal windows, and patient-similarity cohorts to produce executable queries. We introduce CLINS…

cs.CL2025

On Evaluating LLM Alignment by Evaluating LLMs as Judges

Yixin Liu, Pengfei Liu, Arman Cohan

Alignment with human preferences is an important evaluation aspect of LLMs, requiring them to be helpful, honest, safe, and to precisely follow human instructions. Evaluating large…

cs.CL2025

Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks

Andrew M. Bean, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Angelika Romanou +39

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstrac…

cs.CL2025

AlphaResearch: Accelerating New Algorithm Discovery with Language Models

Zhaojian Yu, Kaiyue Feng, Yilun Zhao +3

LLMs have made significant progress in complex but easy-to-verify problems, yet they still struggle with discovering the unknown. In this paper, we present \textbf{AlphaResearch},…

cs.CL2025

LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking

Tingyu Song, Yilun Zhao, Siyue Zhang +2

Existing approaches typically rely on large-scale fine-tuning to adapt LLMs for information reranking tasks, which is computationally expensive. In this work, we demonstrate that m…

cs.CL2025

FinLFQA: Evaluating Attributed Text Generation of LLMs in Financial Long-Form Question Answering

Yitao Long, Tiansheng Hu, Yilun Zhao +2

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate to long-form questions, producing plausible yet factually incorrect answers. A common mitigation strategy is to provide attribut…

cs.CL2025

DyFlow: Dynamic Workflow Framework for Agentic Reasoning

Yanbo Wang, Zixiang Xu, Yue Huang +9

Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in complex reasoning tasks, but building efficient and generalizable workflows remains a major challe…

cs.CL2025

From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculations

Benlu Wang, Iris Xia, Yifan Zhang +6

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising performance on medical benchmarks; however, their ability to perform medical calculations, a crucial aspect of clinical dec…

cs.CL2025

MSRS: Evaluating Multi-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Rohan Phanse, Yijie Zhou, Kejian Shi +4

Retrieval-augmented systems are typically evaluated in settings where information required to answer the query can be found within a single source or the answer is short-form or fa…

cs.CL2025

Ref-Long: Benchmarking the Long-context Referencing Capability of Long-context Language Models

Junjie Wu, Gefei Gu, Yanan Zheng +2

Long-context language models (LCLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities in long-context understanding tasks. Among these, long-context referencing -- a crucial task that requir…

cs.CL2025

Demystifying Scientific Problem-Solving in LLMs by Probing Knowledge and Reasoning

Alan Li, Yixin Liu, Arpan Sarkar +2

Scientific problem solving poses unique challenges for LLMs, requiring both deep domain knowledge and the ability to apply such knowledge through complex reasoning. While automated…

cs.CL2025

AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific Research

Yilun Zhao, Weiyuan Chen, Zhijian Xu +5

We introduce AbGen, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in designing ablation studies for scientific research. AbGen consists of 1,500 expert-annotate…

cs.CL2025

Can Multimodal Foundation Models Understand Schematic Diagrams? An Empirical Study on Information-Seeking QA over Scientific Papers

Yilun Zhao, Chengye Wang, Chuhan Li +1

This paper introduces MISS-QA, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the ability of models to interpret schematic diagrams within scientific literature. MISS-QA com…

cs.CL2025

Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research Papers

Zhijian Xu, Yilun Zhao, Manasi Patwardhan +2

Peer review is fundamental to scientific research, but the growing volume of publications has intensified the challenges of this expertise-intensive process. While LLMs show promis…

cs.CL2025

SciArena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Non-Verifiable Scientific Literature-Grounded Tasks

Yilun Zhao, Kaiyan Zhang, Tiansheng Hu +15

We present SciArena, an open and collaborative platform for evaluating foundation models on scientific literature-grounded tasks. Unlike traditional benchmarks for scientific liter…

cs.CL2025

SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification

Chengye Wang, Yifei Shen, Zexi Kuang +2

We introduce SciVer, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the ability of foundation models to verify claims within a multimodal scientific context. SciVer consists…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing

Hongjun Liu, Yilun Zhao, Arman Cohan +1

Automatic fact-checking has recently received more attention as a means of combating misinformation. Despite significant advancements, fact-checking systems based on retrieval-augm…

cs.CL2025

MultiFinBen: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multilingual and Multimodal Financial Application

Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang +44

Real-world financial analysis involves information across multiple languages and modalities, from reports and news to scanned filings and meeting recordings. Yet most existing eval…