1 citations · 1 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
MSRS: Evaluating Multi-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Rohan Phanse, Yijie Zhou, Kejian Shi +4
Retrieval-augmented systems are typically evaluated in settings where information required to answer the query can be found within a single source or the answer is short-form or fa…
AbGen: Evaluating Large Language Models in Ablation Study Design and Evaluation for Scientific Research
Yilun Zhao, Weiyuan Chen, Zhijian Xu +5
We introduce AbGen, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs in designing ablation studies for scientific research. AbGen consists of 1,500 expert-annotate…
Re-evaluating Automatic LLM System Ranking for Alignment with Human Preference
Mingqi Gao, Yixin Liu, Xinyu Hu +3
Evaluating and ranking the capabilities of different LLMs is crucial for understanding their performance and alignment with human preferences. Due to the high cost and time-consumi…
M3SciQA: A Multi-Modal Multi-Document Scientific QA Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Chuhan Li, Ziyao Shangguan, Yilun Zhao +3
Existing benchmarks for evaluating foundation models mainly focus on single-document, text-only tasks. However, they often fail to fully capture the complexity of research workflow…
ReIFE: Re-evaluating Instruction-Following Evaluation
Yixin Liu, Kejian Shi, Alexander R. Fabbri +5
The automatic evaluation of instruction following typically involves using large language models (LLMs) to assess response quality. However, there is a lack of comprehensive evalua…