2 citations · 4 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for
12 papers
Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall, Elizabeth Gadd
UK academic departments are evaluated partly on the statements that they write about the value of their research environments for the Research Excellence Framework (REF) periodic a…
How is science discussed on Bluesky?
Er-Te Zheng, Xiaorui Jiang, Zhichao Fang +1
Amid the migration of academics from X, the social media platform Bluesky has emerged as a potential alternative. To assess its viability and relevance for science communication, t…
Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
Mike Thelwall
Although both Google Gemini (1.5 Flash) and ChatGPT (4o and 4o-mini) give research quality evaluation scores that correlate positively with expert scores in nearly all fields, and…
Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
Mike Thelwall, Yunhan Yang
The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT's quality scores for journal articles correlate more strongly with human judgements than some citation-based indicators in most fields. Avera…
Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
Mike Thelwall
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies like ChatGPT now threaten bibliometrics as the primary generators of research quality indicators. They are already used in at least one re…
Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
Er-Te Zheng, Hui-Zhen Fu, Xiaorui Jiang +2
News and social media are widely used to disseminate science, but do they also help raise awareness of problems in research? This study investigates whether high levels of news and…