activity
20232026
most citedA Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming

11 citations · 38 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

12 papers · 1 filter

cs.CR2024

Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy

Yangsibo Huang, Daogao Liu, Lynn Chua +7

Machine unlearning algorithms, designed for selective removal of training data from models, have emerged as a promising approach to growing privacy concerns. In this work, we expos…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

On Memorization of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning

Chulin Xie, Yangsibo Huang, Chiyuan Zhang +6

Large language models (LLMs) achieve good performance on challenging reasoning benchmarks, yet could also make basic reasoning mistakes. This contrasting behavior is puzzling when…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety

Jakub Łucki, Boyi Wei, Yangsibo Huang +3

Large language models are finetuned to refuse questions about hazardous knowledge, but these protections can often be bypassed. Unlearning methods aim at completely removing hazard…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models

Weijia Shi, Jaechan Lee, Yangsibo Huang +7

Language models (LMs) are trained on vast amounts of text data, which may include private and copyrighted content. Data owners may request the removal of their data from a trained…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models

Boyi Wei, Weijia Shi, Yangsibo Huang +5

Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material. These models can memorize and generate content…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models

Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Yangsibo Huang +6

Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora. But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e…

cs.AI2024★ 6 cited

SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal

Tinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng +13

Evaluating aligned large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests is crucial for safe, policy-compliant deployments. Existing evaluation efforts…

cs.CV2024★ 2 cited

Fantastic Copyrighted Beasts and How (Not) to Generate Them

Luxi He, Yangsibo Huang, Weijia Shi +7

Recent studies show that image and video generation models can be prompted to reproduce copyrighted content from their training data, raising serious legal concerns about copyright…

cs.CL2024

Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning

Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Yangsibo Huang +6

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for tackling complex tasks across diverse domains, but they also raise privacy concerns when fine-tuned on sensitive dat…

cs.CR2024★ 2 cited

AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security

Xiangyu Qi, Yangsibo Huang, Yi Zeng +22

The exposure of security vulnerabilities in safety-aligned language models, e.g., susceptibility to adversarial attacks, has shed light on the intricate interplay between AI safety…

cs.AI2024★ 11 cited

A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming

Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Kevin Klyman +20

Independent evaluation and red teaming are critical for identifying the risks posed by generative AI systems. However, the terms of service and enforcement strategies used by promi…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications

Boyi Wei, Kaixuan Huang, Yangsibo Huang +6

Large language models (LLMs) show inherent brittleness in their safety mechanisms, as evidenced by their susceptibility to jailbreaking and even non-malicious fine-tuning. This stu…