activity
20242026
most citedSelf-Taught Evaluators

3 citations · 13 across the 21 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

16 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

SPICE: Self-Play In Corpus Environments Improves Reasoning

Bo Liu, Chuanyang Jin, Seungone Kim +7

Self-improving systems require environmental interaction for continuous adaptation. We introduce SPICE (Self-Play In Corpus Environments), a reinforcement learning framework where…

cs.CL2025

Hybrid Reinforcement: When Reward Is Sparse, It's Better to Be Dense

Leitian Tao, Ilia Kulikov, Swarnadeep Saha +5

Post-training for reasoning of large language models (LLMs) increasingly relies on verifiable rewards: deterministic checkers that provide 0-1 correctness signals. While reliable,…

cs.CL2025

The Majority is not always right: RL training for solution aggregation

Wenting Zhao, Pranjal Aggarwal, Swarnadeep Saha +3

Scaling up test-time compute, by generating multiple independent solutions and selecting or aggregating among them, has become a central paradigm for improving large language model…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

OptimalThinkingBench: Evaluating Over and Underthinking in LLMs

Pranjal Aggarwal, Seungone Kim, Jack Lanchantin +4

Thinking LLMs solve complex tasks at the expense of increased compute and overthinking on simpler problems, while non-thinking LLMs are faster and cheaper but underthink on harder…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Learning to Reason for Factuality

Xilun Chen, Ilia Kulikov, Vincent-Pierre Berges +5

Reasoning Large Language Models (R-LLMs) have significantly advanced complex reasoning tasks but often struggle with factuality, generating substantially more hallucinations than t…

cs.CL2025

NaturalThoughts: Selecting and Distilling Reasoning Traces for General Reasoning Tasks

Yang Li, Youssef Emad, Karthik Padthe +8

Recent work has shown that distilling reasoning traces from a larger teacher model via supervised finetuning outperforms reinforcement learning with the smaller student model alone…

cs.CL2025

Bridging Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning for LLMs

Jack Lanchantin, Angelica Chen, Janice Lan +9

We investigate the effectiveness of reinforcement learning methods for finetuning large language models when transitioning from offline to semi-online to fully online regimes for b…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement Learning

Chenxi Whitehouse, Tianlu Wang, Ping Yu +4

The progress of AI is bottlenecked by the quality of evaluation, making powerful LLM-as-a-Judge models a core solution. The efficacy of these judges depends on their chain-of-thoug…

cs.CL2025

Post-training an LLM for RAG? Train on Self-Generated Demonstrations

Matthew Finlayson, Ilia Kulikov, Daniel M. Bikel +3

Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with knowledge intensive NLP tasks, such as answering "Who won the latest World Cup?" because the knowledge they learn during training m…

cs.CL2025

NaturalReasoning: Reasoning in the Wild with 2.8M Challenging Questions

Weizhe Yuan, Jane Yu, Song Jiang +8

Scaling reasoning capabilities beyond traditional domains such as math and coding is hindered by the lack of diverse and high-quality questions. To overcome this limitation, we int…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Diverse Preference Optimization

Jack Lanchantin, Angelica Chen, Shehzaad Dhuliawala +4

Post-training of language models, either through reinforcement learning, preference optimization or supervised finetuning, tends to sharpen the output probability distribution and…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Adaptive Decoding via Latent Preference Optimization

Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Ilia Kulikov, Ping Yu +4

During language model decoding, it is known that using higher temperature sampling gives more creative responses, while lower temperatures are more factually accurate. However, suc…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

Self-Taught Evaluators

Tianlu Wang, Ilia Kulikov, Olga Golovneva +7

Model-based evaluation is at the heart of successful model development -- as a reward model for training, and as a replacement for human evaluation. To train such evaluators, the s…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Distilling System 2 into System 1

Ping Yu, Jing Xu, Jason Weston +1

Large language models (LLMs) can spend extra compute during inference to generate intermediate thoughts, which helps to produce better final responses. Since Chain-of-Thought (Wei…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Following Length Constraints in Instructions

Weizhe Yuan, Ilia Kulikov, Ping Yu +4

Aligned instruction following models can better fulfill user requests than their unaligned counterparts. However, it has been shown that there is a length bias in evaluation of suc…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Models

Sean Welleck, Amanda Bertsch, Matthew Finlayson +5

One of the most striking findings in modern research on large language models (LLMs) is that scaling up compute during training leads to better results. However, less attention has…