collaborators

7 papers

cs.CL2026

KMMMU: Evaluation of Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding in Korean Language and Context

Nahyun Lee, Guijin Son, Hyunwoo Ko +4

Multimodal evaluation is strengthened when benchmarks reflect the languages, institutions, and disciplinary conventions that shape expert visual reasoning. We introduce KMMMU, a na…

cs.CL2026

EXAONE 4.5 Technical Report

Eunbi Choi, Kibong Choi, Sehyun Chun +55

This technical report introduces EXAONE 4.5, the first open-weight vision language model released by LG AI Research. EXAONE 4.5 is architected by integrating a dedicated visual enc…

cs.CL2025

LAD-RAG: Layout-aware Dynamic RAG for Visually-Rich Document Understanding

Zhivar Sourati, Zheng Wang, Marianne Menglin Liu +8

Question answering over visually rich documents (VRDs) requires reasoning not only over isolated content but also over documents' structural organization and cross-page dependencie…

cs.CL2025

KAIO: A Collection of More Challenging Korean Questions

Nahyun Lee, Guijin Son, Hyunwoo Ko +1

With the advancement of mid/post-training techniques, LLMs are pushing their boundaries at an accelerated pace. Legacy benchmarks saturate quickly (e.g., broad suites like MMLU ove…

cs.CL2025

Exploring the Impact of Instruction-Tuning on LLM's Susceptibility to Misinformation

Kyubeen Han, Junseo Jang, Hongjin Kim +2

Instruction-tuning enhances the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow user instructions more accurately, improving usability while reducing harmful outputs. However, th…

cs.CL2025

EXAONE 4.0: Unified Large Language Models Integrating Non-reasoning and Reasoning Modes

Kyunghoon Bae, Eunbi Choi, Kibong Choi +37

This technical report introduces EXAONE 4.0, which integrates a Non-reasoning mode and a Reasoning mode to achieve both the excellent usability of EXAONE 3.5 and the advanced reaso…

cs.CL2025

Faithful, Unfaithful or Ambiguous? Multi-Agent Debate with Initial Stance for Summary Evaluation

Mahnaz Koupaee, Jake W. Vincent, Saab Mansour +9

Faithfulness evaluators based on large language models (LLMs) are often fooled by the fluency of the text and struggle with identifying errors in the summaries. We propose an appro…