activity
20232026
most citedFrom SHAP Scores to Feature Importance Scores

3 citations · 13 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

19 papers

cs.AI2026

Interval Certifications for Multilayered Perceptrons via Lattice Traversal

Merkouris Papamichail, Konstantinos Varsos, Giorgos Flouris +1

In this work we present a rigorous theoretical framework to a foundational problem of AI safety, namely adversarial robustness. In particular, we show that the adversarial robustne…

cs.LG2026

Are Safety Guarantees in Neural Networks Safe? How to Compute Trustworthy Robustness Certifications

Merkouris Papamichail, Konstantinos Varsos, Giorgos Flouris +1

A primary challenge in AI safety is the existence of adversarial examples -- slightly distorted inputs that cause a neural network (NN) to misclassify. To mitigate this problem, re…

cs.AI2026

Towards Rigorous Explainability by Feature Attribution

Olivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, Joao Marques-Silva

For around a decade, non-symbolic methods have been the option of choice when explaining complex machine learning (ML) models. Unfortunately, such methods lack rigor and can mislea…

cs.LG2026

The Cost of Relaxation: Evaluating the Error in Convex Neural Network Verification

Merkouris Papamichail, Konstantinos Varsos, Giorgos Flouris +1

Many neural network (NN) verification systems represent the network's input-output relation as a constraint program. Sound and complete, representations involve integer constraints…

cs.AI2025

Uncovering Bugs in Formal Explainers: A Case Study with PyXAI

Xuanxiang Huang, Yacine Izza, Alexey Ignatiev +1

Formal explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) offers unique theoretical guarantees of rigor when compared to other non-formal methods of explainability. However, little attentio…

cs.AI2025

Efficient & Correct Predictive Equivalence for Decision Trees

Joao Marques-Silva, Alexey Ignatiev

The Rashomon set of decision trees (DTs) finds importance uses. Recent work showed that DTs computing the same classification function, i.e. predictive equivalent DTs, can represen…

cs.AI2025

Rigorous Feature Importance Scores based on Shapley Value and Banzhaf Index

Xuanxiang Huang, Olivier Létoffé, Joao Marques-Silva

Feature attribution methods based on game theory are ubiquitous in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Recent works proposed rigorous feature attribution using…

cs.AI2025

On Trustworthy Rule-Based Models and Explanations

Mohamed Siala, Jordi Planes, Joao Marques-Silva

A task of interest in machine learning (ML) is that of ascribing explanations to the predictions made by ML models. Furthermore, in domains deemed high risk, the rigor of explanati…

cs.AI2025

Most General Explanations of Tree Ensembles (Extended Version)

Yacine Izza, Alexey Ignatiev, Sasha Rubin +2

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is critical for attaining trust in the operation of AI systems. A key question of an AI system is ``why was this decision made this way''.…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

The Explanation Game -- Rekindled (Extended Version)

Joao Marques-Silva, Xuanxiang Huang, Olivier Letoffe

Recent work demonstrated the existence of critical flaws in the current use of Shapley values in explainable AI (XAI), i.e. the so-called SHAP scores. These flaws are significant i…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Efficient Contrastive Explanations on Demand

Yacine Izza, Joao Marques-Silva

Recent work revealed a tight connection between adversarial robustness and restricted forms of symbolic explanations, namely distance-based (formal) explanations. This connection i…

cs.LG2024

SHAP scores fail pervasively even when Lipschitz succeeds

Olivier Letoffe, Xuanxiang Huang, Joao Marques-Silva

The ubiquitous use of Shapley values in eXplainable AI (XAI) has been triggered by the tool SHAP, and as a result are commonly referred to as SHAP scores. Recent work devised examp…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future

Joao Marques-Silva

In recent years, the impact of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in society has been absolutely remarkable. This impact is expected to continue in the foreseea…

cs.AI2024★ 3 cited

From SHAP Scores to Feature Importance Scores

Olivier Letoffe, Xuanxiang Huang, Nicholas Asher +1

A central goal of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is to assign relative importance to the features of a Machine Learning (ML) model given some prediction. The importance…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementation

Yacine Izza, Xuanxiang Huang, Antonio Morgado +3

The uses of machine learning (ML) have snowballed in recent years. In many cases, ML models are highly complex, and their operation is beyond the understanding of human decision-ma…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Towards trustable SHAP scores

Olivier Letoffe, Xuanxiang Huang, Joao Marques-Silva

SHAP scores represent the proposed use of the well-known Shapley values in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Recent work has shown that the exact computation of SHAP score…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

The Pros and Cons of Adversarial Robustness

Yacine Izza, Joao Marques-Silva

Robustness is widely regarded as a fundamental problem in the analysis of machine learning (ML) models. Most often robustness equates with deciding the non-existence of adversarial…

cs.LG2023★ 1 cited

Locally-Minimal Probabilistic Explanations

Yacine Izza, Kuldeep S. Meel, Joao Marques-Silva

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is widely regarding as a cornerstone of trustworthy AI. Unfortunately, most work on XAI offers no guarantees of rigor. In high-stakes doma…

cs.AI2023★ 2 cited

Refutation of Shapley Values for XAI -- Additional Evidence

Xuanxiang Huang, Joao Marques-Silva

Recent work demonstrated the inadequacy of Shapley values for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Although to disprove a theory a single counterexample suffices, a possible…