activity
20242026
most citedWhere is the Truth? The Risk of Getting Confounded in a Continual World

1 citations · 4 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

23 papers

cs.CL2026

KletterMix: Climbing Toward High-Quality German Pretraining Data - The Full Report

Maurice Kraus, Ruben Härle, Sebastian Sztwiertnia +5

High-quality pretraining data is a central ingredient in modern language models, but German-language resources remain far less developed than their English counterparts: they are o…

cs.CL2026★ 1 cited

A Sovereign, Open-Source Foundation Model for German and English

Soofi-Team, :, Benedikt Droste +30

We present Soofi S 30B-A3B, a sovereign, open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) hybrid Mamba Transformer foundation model for German and English. Its hybrid design activates only 3B…

cs.LG2026

COCOLogic-V2: Identifying Logical Inconsistencies via Truly Hard-Negatives

David Steinmann, Antonia Wüst, Kristian Kersting +1

While interpretable models such as concept bottleneck models (CBMs) and program synthesis methods enable verification of model decisions, their evaluation is typically limited to s…

cs.LG2026

Do Sparse Autoencoders Learn Meaningful Concept Hierarchies?

Nils Grandien, David Steinmann, Felix Friedrich +1

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have become an important tool for unsupervised concept discovery in large models. To make the resulting feature spaces more interpretable and manageable,…

cs.CL2026

Beyond Prompt and Parser Engineering: Soft-Prompt Tuning for Automated LLM Evaluation

Selen Erkan, Bastian Boll, Kristian Kersting +2

Benchmark scores often misrepresent a large language model's (LLM's) knowledge, because they rely, e.g., on the model's ability to follow specific formatting requirements. This esp…

cs.LG2026

Imitation learning for clinical decision support in pediatric ECMO

Fateme Golivand, Michael Skinner, Saurabh Mathur +5

Pediatric critical care is a dynamic, high-stakes process involving constant monitoring and adjustments in life-saving treatments. Modeling these interventions is crucial for effec…

cs.LG2026

Neurosymbolic Imitation Learning with Human Guidance: A Privileged Information Approach

Nikhilesh Prabhakar, Varun Balaji, Athresh Karanam +2

Imitation learning is widely used for learning to act in complex environments. While pure neural-based methods handle high dimensional data effectively, they suffer from the requir…

cs.AI2026

GRAIL: Autonomous Concept Grounding for Neuro-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning

Hikaru Shindo, Henri Rößler, Quentin Delfosse +1

Neuro-symbolic Reinforcement Learning (NeSy-RL) combines symbolic reasoning with gradient-based optimization to achieve interpretable and generalizable policies. Relational concept…

cs.CL2026

AtManRL: Towards Faithful Reasoning via Differentiable Attention Saliency

Max Henning Höth, Kristian Kersting, Björn Deiseroth +1

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet a reasoning trace may merely accompany the final answer rather than c…

cs.AI2026

SocialGrid: A Benchmark for Planning and Social Reasoning in Embodied Multi-Agent Systems

Hikaru Shindo, Hanzhao Lin, Lukas Helff +2

As Large Language Models (LLMs) transition from text processors to autonomous agents, evaluating their social reasoning in embodied multi-agent settings becomes critical. We introd…

cs.LG2026

LLMs Gaming Verifiers: RLVR can Lead to Reward Hacking

Lukas Helff, Quentin Delfosse, David Steinmann +6

As reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become the dominant paradigm for scaling reasoning capabilities in LLMs, a new failure mode emerges: LLMs gaming verifi…

cs.LG2026

Recursive Inference Machines for Neural Reasoning

Mieszko Komisarczyk, Saurabh Mathur, Maurice Kraus +2

Neural reasoners such as Tiny Recursive Models (TRMs) solve complex problems by combining neural backbones with specialized inference schemes. Such inference schemes have been a ce…

cs.CL2025

Bounding Hallucinations: Merlin-Arthur Protocols for Mutual-Information Bounds in Language Models

Björn Deiseroth, Max Henning Höth, Kristian Kersting +1

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies on retrieved context to guide large language models (LLM), yet treats the retrieval as a heuristic rather than verifiable evidence -- le…

cs.LG2025

Multipole Semantic Attention: A Fast Approximation of Softmax Attention for Pretraining

Rupert Mitchell, Kristian Kersting

Pretraining transformers on long sequences (entire code repositories, collections of related documents) is bottlenecked by quadratic attention costs. We present Multipole Semantic…

cs.AI2025

Learning from Less: Guiding Deep Reinforcement Learning with Differentiable Symbolic Planning

Zihan Ye, Oleg Arenz, Kristian Kersting

When tackling complex problems, humans naturally break them down into smaller, manageable subtasks and adjust their initial plans based on observations. For instance, if you want t…

cs.LG2025

Object Centric Concept Bottlenecks

David Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Antonia Wüst +1

Developing high-performing, yet interpretable models remains a critical challenge in modern AI. Concept-based models (CBMs) attempt to address this by extracting human-understandab…

cs.LG2025

Continual Learning Should Move Beyond Incremental Classification

Rupert Mitchell, Antonio Alliegro, Raffaello Camoriano +17

Continual learning (CL) is the sub-field of machine learning concerned with accumulating knowledge in dynamic environments. So far, CL research has mainly focused on incremental cl…

cs.AI2024

Interpretable end-to-end Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning agents

Nils Grandien, Quentin Delfosse, Kristian Kersting

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents rely on shortcut learning, preventing them from generalizing to slightly different environments. To address this problem, symbolic method, t…

cs.AI2024★ 1 cited

Neural Concept Binder

Wolfgang Stammer, Antonia Wüst, David Steinmann +1

The challenge in object-based visual reasoning lies in generating concept representations that are both descriptive and distinct. Achieving this in an unsupervised manner requires…

cs.AI2024

Interpretable and Editable Programmatic Tree Policies for Reinforcement Learning

Hector Kohler, Quentin Delfosse, Riad Akrour +2

Deep reinforcement learning agents are prone to goal misalignments. The black-box nature of their policies hinders the detection and correction of such misalignments, and the trust…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Where is the Truth? The Risk of Getting Confounded in a Continual World

Florian Peter Busch, Roshni Kamath, Rupert Mitchell +3

A dataset is confounded if it is most easily solved via a spurious correlation, which fails to generalize to new data. In this work, we show that, in a continual learning setting w…

cs.LG2024

BOWL: A Deceptively Simple Open World Learner

Roshni . R. Kamath, Rupert Mitchell, Subarnaduti Paul +2

Traditional machine learning excels on static benchmarks, but the real world is dynamic and seldom as carefully curated as test sets. Practical applications may generally encounter…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Interpretable Concept Bottlenecks to Align Reinforcement Learning Agents

Quentin Delfosse, Sebastian Sztwiertnia, Mark Rothermel +2

Goal misalignment, reward sparsity and difficult credit assignment are only a few of the many issues that make it difficult for deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents to learn opt…