activity
20232026
most citedSummarization is (Almost) Dead

33 citations · 54 across the 18 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

19 papers

cs.CL2026

CE-RM: A Pointwise Generative Reward Model Optimized via Two-Stage Rollout and Unified Criteria

Xinyu Hu, Yancheng He, Weixun Wang +6

Automatic evaluation is crucial yet challenging for open-ended natural language generation, especially when rule-based metrics are infeasible. Compared with traditional methods, th…

cs.CL2025

SCOPE: Intrinsic Semantic Space Control for Mitigating Copyright Infringement in LLMs

Zhenliang Zhang, Xinyu Hu, Xiaojun Wan

Large language models sometimes inadvertently reproduce passages that are copyrighted, exposing downstream applications to legal risk. Most existing studies for inference-time defe…

cs.LG2025

LoaQ: Layer-wise Output Approximation Quantization

Li Lin, Xiaojun Wan

A natural and intuitive idea in model quantization is to approximate each component's quantized output to match its original. Motivated by this idea, most layer-wise post-training…

cs.CL2025

LEDOM: Reverse Language Model

Xunjian Yin, Sitao Cheng, Yuxi Xie +6

Autoregressive language models are trained exclusively left-to-right. We explore the complementary factorization, training right-to-left at scale, and ask what reasoning patterns e…

cs.LG2025

NeUQI: Near-Optimal Uniform Quantization Parameter Initialization for Low-Bit LLMs

Li Lin, Xinyu Hu, Xiaojun Wan

Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance across domains but face significant challenges when deployed on consumer-grade GPUs or personal devices such as laptops,…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

CFunModel: A "Funny" Language Model Capable of Chinese Humor Generation and Processing

Zhenghan Yu, Xinyu Hu, Xiaojun Wan

Humor plays a significant role in daily language communication. With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs), natural language processing has made significant strides…

cs.CL2025

Exploring the Multilingual NLG Evaluation Abilities of LLM-Based Evaluators

Jiayi Chang, Mingqi Gao, Xinyu Hu +1

Previous research has shown that LLMs have potential in multilingual NLG evaluation tasks. However, existing research has not fully explored the differences in the evaluation capab…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Aspect-Guided Multi-Level Perturbation Analysis of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review

Jiatao Li, Yanheng Li, Xinyu Hu +2

We propose an aspect-guided, multi-level perturbation framework to evaluate the robustness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automated peer review. Our framework explores perturba…

cs.CL2025

Re-evaluating Automatic LLM System Ranking for Alignment with Human Preference

Mingqi Gao, Yixin Liu, Xinyu Hu +3

Evaluating and ranking the capabilities of different LLMs is crucial for understanding their performance and alignment with human preferences. Due to the high cost and time-consumi…

cs.CL2025

Who Writes What: Unveiling the Impact of Author Roles on AI-generated Text Detection

Jiatao Li, Xiaojun Wan

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates accurate AI-generated text detection. However, current approaches largely overlook the influence of author characteristics. We…

cs.CL2025

A Dual-Perspective NLG Meta-Evaluation Framework with Automatic Benchmark and Better Interpretability

Xinyu Hu, Mingqi Gao, Li Lin +2

In NLG meta-evaluation, evaluation metrics are typically assessed based on their consistency with humans. However, we identify some limitations in traditional NLG meta-evaluation a…

cs.CL2024

Analyzing and Evaluating Correlation Measures in NLG Meta-Evaluation

Mingqi Gao, Xinyu Hu, Li Lin +1

The correlation between NLG automatic evaluation metrics and human evaluation is often regarded as a critical criterion for assessing the capability of an evaluation metric. Howeve…

cs.CL2024

Better than Random: Reliable NLG Human Evaluation with Constrained Active Sampling

Jie Ruan, Xiao Pu, Mingqi Gao +2

Human evaluation is viewed as a reliable evaluation method for NLG which is expensive and time-consuming. To save labor and costs, researchers usually perform human evaluation on a…

cs.CL2024

Defining and Detecting Vulnerability in Human Evaluation Guidelines: A Preliminary Study Towards Reliable NLG Evaluation

Jie Ruan, Wenqing Wang, Xiaojun Wan

Human evaluation serves as the gold standard for assessing the quality of Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems. Nevertheless, the evaluation guideline, as a pivotal element en…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability

Xinyu Hu, Li Lin, Mingqi Gao +2

The evaluation of natural language generation (NLG) tasks is a significant and longstanding research area. With the recent emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs), some…

cs.CL2024

Are LLM-based Evaluators Confusing NLG Quality Criteria?

Xinyu Hu, Mingqi Gao, Sen Hu +4

Some prior work has shown that LLMs perform well in NLG evaluation for different tasks. However, we discover that LLMs seem to confuse different evaluation criteria, which reduces…

cs.CL2024★ 15 cited

LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges

Mingqi Gao, Xinyu Hu, Jie Ruan +2

Evaluating natural language generation (NLG) is a vital but challenging problem in natural language processing. Traditional evaluation metrics mainly capturing content (e.g. n-gram…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

OpinSummEval: Revisiting Automated Evaluation for Opinion Summarization

Yuchen Shen, Xiaojun Wan

Opinion summarization sets itself apart from other types of summarization tasks due to its distinctive focus on aspects and sentiments. Although certain automated evaluation method…

cs.CL2023★ 33 cited

Summarization is (Almost) Dead

Xiao Pu, Mingqi Gao, Xiaojun Wan

How well can large language models (LLMs) generate summaries? We develop new datasets and conduct human evaluation experiments to evaluate the zero-shot generation capability of LL…