6 papers · 1 filter
Retrieval- and Argumentation-Enhanced Multi-Agent LLMs for Judgmental Forecasting (Extended Version with Supplementary Material)
Deniz Gorur, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Judgmental forecasting is the task of making predictions about future events based on human judgment. This task can be seen as a form of claim verification, where the claim corresp…
Argumentatively Coherent Judgmental Forecasting
Deniz Gorur, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Judgmental forecasting employs human opinions to make predictions about future events, rather than exclusively historical data as in quantitative forecasting. When these opinions f…
On Gradual Semantics for Assumption-Based Argumentation
Anna Rapberger, Fabrizio Russo, Antonio Rago +1
In computational argumentation, gradual semantics are fine-grained alternatives to extension-based and labelling-based semantics . They ascribe a dialectical strength to (component…
Contestability in Quantitative Argumentation
Xiang Yin, Nico Potyka, Antonio Rago +2
Contestable AI requires that AI-driven decisions align with human preferences. While various forms of argumentation have been shown to support contestability, Edge-Weighted Quantit…
Free Argumentative Exchanges for Explaining Image Classifiers
Avinash Kori, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Deep learning models are powerful image classifiers but their opacity hinders their trustworthiness. Explanation methods for capturing the reasoning process within these classifier…
A Methodology for Incompleteness-Tolerant and Modular Gradual Semantics for Argumentative Statement Graphs
Antonio Rago, Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Francesca Toni +2
Gradual semantics (GS) have demonstrated great potential in argumentation, in particular for deploying quantitative bipolar argumentation frameworks (QBAFs) in a number of real-wor…