activity
20232026
most citedArtificial Intelligence Index Report 2024

160 citations · 314 across the 32 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

35 papers

cs.AI2026

Agent Evaluation Reliability: More Tasks Won't (Always) Fix An Agent Leaderboard

Michael Hardy, Ruhana Azam, Anka Reuel +2

Agent evaluations are increasingly used to compare LLMs and inform deployment decisions, yet ranks can reflect not only the model but also the effects of the evaluation conditions…

cs.CY2026

Embedded Assessments for Frontier AI

Jacob Charnock, Sophie Williams, Zaheed Kara +5

Third-party evaluations for frontier AI have mostly tested models through external interfaces before deployment. But the risks from frontier AI models depend on how their developer…

cs.AI2026

Every Eval Ever: A Unifying Schema and Community Repository for AI Evaluation Results

Jan Batzner, Sree Harsha Nelaturu, Damian Stachura +45

AI evaluations are widely used for testing and understanding progress. However, the diverse evaluators bring with them inconsistencies that challenge analysis and comparison. First…

cs.AI2026

Evaluation Cards: An Interpretive Layer for AI Evaluation Reporting

Avijit Ghosh, Anka Reuel, Jenny Chim +45

AI evaluation results are produced at scale but reported inconsistently across leaderboards, model cards, benchmark papers, and company blogs. The cost is interpretive: readers can…

cs.LG2026

Welfare, Improvability, and Variance: A Principal-Agent Approach to Optimal Benchmark Item Aggregation

Andreas Haupt, Justin Hartenstein, Anka Reuel +2

AI benchmarks have well-documented limitations, with prior work examining contamination, saturation, and construct underspecification. Aggregation has received far less attention:…

cs.AI2026

AI Cartography: Mapping the Latent Landscape of AI Benchmark Ecosystems

Michael Hardy, Anka Reuel, Lijin Zhang +6

While aggregate leaderboard scores drive AI development, they contain substantial measurement noise whose sources and magnitudes remain unquantified, making it unclear when ranking…

cs.CY2026★ 1 cited

Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies

Miles Brundage, Noemi Dreksler, Aidan Homewood +45

We outline a vision for frontier AI auditing, which we define as rigorous third-party verification of frontier AI developers' safety and security claims, and evaluation of their sy…

cs.AI2026★ 2 cited

When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation

Mubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni +34

Artificial intelligence benchmarks are an important mechanism to measure model progress and guide deployment decisions. However, benchmarks quickly "saturate", making it difficult…

cs.CY2026

Legal Alignment for Safe and Ethical AI

Noam Kolt, Nicholas Caputo, Jack Boeglin +14

Alignment of artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses the normative problem of specifying how AI systems should act and the technical problem of ensuring AI systems comply with tho…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Video Deepfake Abuse: How Company Choices Predictably Shape Misuse Patterns

Max Kamachee, Stephen Casper, Michelle L. Ding +4

In 2022, AI image generators crossed a threshold, enabling much more efficient and dynamic production of photorealistic deepfake images than before. This enabled opportunities for…

cs.AI2025

Fantastic Bugs and Where to Find Them in AI Benchmarks

Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Michael Hardy +8

Benchmarks are pivotal in driving AI progress, and invalid benchmark questions frequently undermine their reliability. Manually identifying and correcting errors among thousands of…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations

Anka Reuel, Avijit Ghosh, Jenny Chim +32

Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities. Although general c…

cs.SE2025

Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk

Sean McGregor, Victor Lu, Vassil Tashev +8

Large language model (LLM) benchmarks inform LLM use decisions (e.g., "is this LLM safe to deploy for my use case and context?"). However, benchmarks may be rendered unreliable by…

cs.CY2025

An Adaptive Responsible AI Governance Framework for Decentralized Organizations

Kiana Jafari Meimandi, Anka Reuel, Gabriela Aranguiz-Dias +6

This paper examines the assessment challenges of Responsible AI (RAI) governance efforts in globally decentralized organizations through a case study collaboration between a leadin…

cs.CY2025★ 2 cited

Measuring and mitigating overreliance to build human-compatible AI

Lujain Ibrahim, Katherine M. Collins, Sunnie S. Y. Kim +14

Large language models (LLMs) distinguish themselves from previous technologies by functioning as collaborative ``thought partners,'' capable of engaging more fluidly in natural lan…

cs.CY2025★ 4 cited

Measurement to Meaning: A Validity-Centered Framework for AI Evaluation

Olawale Salaudeen, Anka Reuel, Ahmed Ahmed +6

While the capabilities and utility of AI systems have advanced, rigorous norms for evaluating these systems have lagged. Grand claims, such as models achieving general reasoning ca…

cs.CY2025

The California Report on Frontier AI Policy

Rishi Bommasani, Scott R. Singer, Ruth E. Appel +20

The innovations emerging at the frontier of artificial intelligence (AI) are poised to create historic opportunities for humanity but also raise complex policy challenges. Continue…

cs.AI2025

Recommendations and Reporting Checklist for Rigorous & Transparent Human Baselines in Model Evaluations

Kevin L. Wei, Patricia Paskov, Sunishchal Dev +6

In this position paper, we argue that human baselines in foundation model evaluations must be more rigorous and more transparent to enable meaningful comparisons of human vs. AI pe…

cs.CY2025

In Which Areas of Technical AI Safety Could Geopolitical Rivals Cooperate?

Ben Bucknall, Saad Siddiqui, Lara Thurnherr +19

International cooperation is common in AI research, including between geopolitical rivals. While many experts advocate for greater international cooperation on AI safety to address…

cs.CY2025

Audit Cards: Contextualizing AI Evaluations

Leon Staufer, Mick Yang, Anka Reuel +1

AI governance frameworks increasingly rely on audits, yet the results of their underlying evaluations require interpretation and context to be meaningfully informative. Even techni…

cs.AI2025★ 32 cited

Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025

Nestor Maslej, Loredana Fattorini, Raymond Perrault +20

Welcome to the eighth edition of the AI Index report. The 2025 Index is our most comprehensive to date and arrives at an important moment, as AI's influence across society, the eco…

cs.MA2025★ 10 cited

Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI

Lewis Hammond, Alan Chan, Jesse Clifton +41

The rapid development of advanced AI agents and the imminent deployment of many instances of these agents will give rise to multi-agent systems of unprecedented complexity. These s…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective

Yue Huang, Chujie Gao, Siyuan Wu +63

Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. However, their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions.…

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

The Reality of AI and Biorisk

Aidan Peppin, Anka Reuel, Stephen Casper +10

To accurately and confidently answer the question 'could an AI model or system increase biorisk', it is necessary to have both a sound theoretical threat model for how AI models or…