most citedExtracting Problem Structure with LLMs for Optimized SAT Local Search

1 citations · 1 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

13 papers

cs.AI2026

Neurosymbolic Discovery of Algebraic Graph Constructions

David Seka, Stefan Szeider

There are several methods for searching for graphs with prescribed properties, such as SAT solvers and specialized generators. These methods return the result as raw data: an adjac…

cs.AI2026

LeanCSP: A Framework for Certifying Constraint Reformulation and Solving in Lean

Pablo Manrique, Stefan Szeider

Constraint programming is a core technology for solving complex combinatorial problems in scheduling, planning, configuration, and verification. Trusting its results therefore dema…

cs.LO2026

Streaming LRAT Certificates into Lean Theorems

Stefan Szeider

If the certificate produced by a SAT solver is checked by a verified checker, we get a verdict which convinces. But this verdict cannot be named, reused as a lemma, or composed wit…

cs.AI2026

Algorithm Selection with Zero Domain Knowledge via Text Embeddings

Stefan Szeider

We propose ZeroFolio, a feature-free approach to algorithm selection that uses pretrained text embeddings instead of hand-crafted instance features. It reads the raw instance file…

cs.LO2026

Streamliners for Answer Set Programming

Florentina Voboril, Martin Gebser, Stefan Szeider +1

Streamliner constraints reduce the search space of combinatorial problems by ruling out portions of the solution space. We adapt the StreamLLM approach, which uses Large Language M…

cs.AI2026

Agentic Neurosymbolic Collaboration for Mathematical Discovery: A Case Study in Combinatorial Design

Hai Xia, Carla P. Gomes, Bart Selman +1

We study mathematical discovery through the lens of neurosymbolic reasoning, where an AI agent powered by a large language model (LLM), coupled with symbolic computation tools, and…

math.CO2025

From the Finite to the Infinite: Sharper Asymptotic Bounds on Norin's Conjecture via SAT

Markus Kirchweger, Tomáš Peitl, Bernardo Subercaseaux +1

Norin (2008) conjectured that any -edge-coloring of the hypercube in which antipodal edges receive different colors must contain a monochromatic path between some pair of…

cs.AI2025

What Do LLM Agents Do When Left Alone? Evidence of Spontaneous Meta-Cognitive Patterns

Stefan Szeider

We introduce an architecture for studying the behavior of large language model (LLM) agents in the absence of externally imposed tasks. Our continuous reason and act framework, usi…

cs.AI2025

CP-Agent: Agentic Constraint Programming

Stefan Szeider

The translation of natural language to formal constraint models requires expertise in the problem domain and modeling frameworks. To explore the effectiveness of agentic workflows,…

cs.LG2025

Optimal Decision Tree Pruning Revisited: Algorithms and Complexity

Juha Harviainen, Frank Sommer, Manuel Sorge +1

We present a comprehensive classical and parameterized complexity analysis of decision tree pruning operations, extending recent research on the complexity of learning small decisi…

cs.LO2025

Breaking Symmetries in Quantified Graph Search: A Comparative Study

Mikoláš Janota, Markus Kirchweger, Tomáš Peitl +1

Graph generation and enumeration problems often require handling equivalent graphs -- those that differ only in vertex labeling. We study how to extend SAT Modulo Symmetries (SMS),…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

Extracting Problem Structure with LLMs for Optimized SAT Local Search

André Schidler, Stefan Szeider

Local search preprocessing makes Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solvers faster by providing high-quality starting points and modern SAT solvers have incorporated this techn…

cs.AI2025

Smart Cubing for Graph Search: A Comparative Study

Markus Kirchweger, Hai Xia, Tomáš Peitl +1

Parallel solving via cube-and-conquer is a key method for scaling SAT solvers to hard instances. While cube-and-conquer has proven successful for pure SAT problems, notably the Pyt…