15 citations · 34 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for
13 papers
The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities
Stephen Casper, Oskar Galeev, Yoshua Bengio +117
Frontier AI capabilities and autonomy are advancing rapidly. A growing number of real-world incidents make a trusted AI ecosystem essential to embracing AI with confidence. The 202…
International AI Safety Report 2025: Second Key Update: Technical Safeguards and Risk Management
Yoshua Bengio, Stephen Clare, Carina Prunkl +66
This second update to the 2025 International AI Safety Report assesses new developments in general-purpose AI risk management over the past year. It examines how researchers, publi…
Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMs
Kyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony +7
Open-weight AI systems offer unique benefits, including enhanced transparency, open research, and decentralized access. However, they are vulnerable to tampering attacks which can…
The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities
Yoshua Bengio, Tegan Maharaj, Luke Ong +84
Rapidly improving AI capabilities and autonomy hold significant promise of transformation, but are also driving vigorous debate on how to ensure that AI is safe, i.e., trustworthy,…
STACK: Adversarial Attacks on LLM Safeguard Pipelines
Ian R. McKenzie, Oskar J. Hollinsworth, Tom Tseng +5
Frontier AI developers are relying on layers of safeguards to protect against catastrophic misuse of AI systems. Anthropic and OpenAI guard their latest Opus 4 model and GPT-5 mode…
Jailbreak Distillation: Renewable Safety Benchmarking
Jingyu Zhang, Ahmed Elgohary, Xiawei Wang +5
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly deployed in critical applications, raising urgent needs for robust safety benchmarking. We propose Jailbreak Distillation (JBDistill), a no…
Audit Cards: Contextualizing AI Evaluations
Leon Staufer, Mick Yang, Anka Reuel +1
AI governance frameworks increasingly rely on audits, yet the results of their underlying evaluations require interpretation and context to be meaningfully informative. Even techni…
Adversarial Alignment for LLMs Requires Simpler, Reproducible, and More Measurable Objectives
Leo Schwinn, Yan Scholten, Tom Wollschläger +4
Misaligned research objectives have considerably hindered progress in adversarial robustness research over the past decade. For instance, an extensive focus on optimizing target me…
International AI Safety Report
Yoshua Bengio, Sören Mindermann, Daniel Privitera +93
The first International AI Safety Report comprehensively synthesizes the current evidence on the capabilities, risks, and safety of advanced AI systems. The report was mandated by…
Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability
Lee Sharkey, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Batson +26
Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities in order to accomplish concrete scientific and engineering goa…
Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety
Fazl Barez, Tingchen Fu, Ameya Prabhu +16
As AI systems become more capable, widely deployed, and increasingly autonomous in critical areas such as cybersecurity, biological research, and healthcare, ensuring their safety…
The Reality of AI and Biorisk
Aidan Peppin, Anka Reuel, Stephen Casper +10
To accurately and confidently answer the question 'could an AI model or system increase biorisk', it is necessary to have both a sound theoretical threat model for how AI models or…
International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI (Interim Report)
Yoshua Bengio, Sören Mindermann, Daniel Privitera +41
This is the interim publication of the first International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI. The report synthesises the scientific understanding of general-purpose AI…