most citedAI and the Future of Academic Peer Review

1 citations · 1 across the 1 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CY20261 cited

AI and the Future of Academic Peer Review

Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Mateo Aboy, Joel Jiehao Seah +7

Peer review remains the central quality-control mechanism of science, yet its ability to fulfill this role is increasingly strained. Empirical studies document serious shortcomings…

q-bio.NC2026

A Quantifiable Information-Processing Hierarchy Provides a Necessary Condition for Detecting Agency

Brett J. Kagan, Valentina Baccetti, Brian D. Earp +3

As intelligent systems are developed across diverse substrates - from machine learning models and neuromorphic hardware to in vitro neural cultures - understanding what gives a sys…

cs.CY2025

Authorship Without Writing: Large Language Models and the Senior Author Analogy

Clint Hurshman, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Julian Savulescu +1

The use of large language models (LLMs) in bioethical, scientific, and medical writing remains controversial. While there is broad agreement in some circles that LLMs cannot count…

cs.CL2025

Development of Application-Specific Large Language Models to Facilitate Research Ethics Review

Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Joel Seah Jiehao, Stephen R. Latham +3

Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a crucial role in ensuring the ethical conduct of human subjects research, but face challenges including inconsistency, delays, and ineffici…

cs.AI2025

Relational Norms for Human-AI Cooperation

Brian D. Earp, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Mateo Aboy +59

How we should design and interact with social artificial intelligence depends on the socio-relational role the AI is meant to emulate or occupy. In human society, relationships suc…