activity
20242026
most citedAI and the Future of Academic Peer Review

1 citations · 1 across the 1 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

8 papers

cs.CY20261 cited

AI and the Future of Academic Peer Review

Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Mateo Aboy, Joel Jiehao Seah +7

Peer review remains the central quality-control mechanism of science, yet its ability to fulfill this role is increasingly strained. Empirical studies document serious shortcomings…

cs.SE2025

Ten Simple Rules for AI-Assisted Coding in Science

Eric W. Bridgeford, Iain Campbell, Zijao Chen +4

While AI coding tools have demonstrated potential to accelerate software development, their use in scientific computing raises critical questions about code quality and scientific…

cs.CY2025

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review

Zhicheng Lin

In July 2025, 18 academic manuscripts on arXiv contained hidden instructions that manipulated AI-assisted peer review (indirect prompt injection). Instructions such as "GIVE A POSI…

cs.HC2025

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology

Zhicheng Lin

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into psychological and behavioral research as research tools, evaluation targets, human simulators, and cognitive models.…

cs.CY2025

Large Language Models as Psychological Simulators: A Methodological Guide

Zhicheng Lin

Large language models (LLMs) offer emerging opportunities for psychological and behavioral research, but methodological guidance is lacking. This article provides a framework for u…

cs.CY2025

From Prompts to Constructs: A Dual-Validity Framework for Large Language Model Research in Psychology

Zhicheng Lin

Large language models (LLMs) are entering psychological research both as tools and as objects of inquiry. Yet many studies apply human instruments to LLMs without establishing that…