9 citations · 29 across the 33 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
UniDial-EvalKit: A Unified Toolkit for Evaluating Multi-Faceted Conversational Abilities
Qi Jia, Haodong Zhao, Dun Pei +7
Benchmarking large language models (LLMs) and agents in multi-turn interactive scenarios is essential for understanding their practical capabilities. However, existing evaluation p…
Evaluating from Benign to Dynamic Adversarial: A Squid Game for Large Language Models
Zijian Chen, Wenjun Zhang, Guangtao Zhai
The potential data contamination issue in contemporary large language models (LLMs) benchmarks presents a fundamental challenge to establishing trustworthy evaluation frameworks. M…
Sycophancy under Pressure: Evaluating and Mitigating Sycophantic Bias via Adversarial Dialogues in Scientific QA
Kaiwei Zhang, Qi Jia, Zijian Chen +5
Large language models (LLMs), while increasingly used in domains requiring factual rigor, often display a troubling behavior: sycophancy, the tendency to align with user beliefs re…
User-centric Subjective Leaderboard by Customizable Reward Modeling
Qi Jia, Xiujie Song, Zicheng Zhang +4
Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) predominantely focus on assessing their capabilities through verifiable tasks. Such objective and static benchmarks offer limit…
The Ever-Evolving Science Exam
Junying Wang, Zicheng Zhang, Yijin Guo +9
As foundation models grow rapidly in capability and deployment, evaluating their scientific understanding becomes increasingly critical. Existing science benchmarks have made progr…