activity
20232026
most citedImproving vision-inspired keyword spotting using dynamic module skipping in streaming conformer encoder

4 citations · 5 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.LG2026

Efficient Mixture-of-Experts with Speculative Decoding via Expert Coactivation

Kumari Nishu, Han-Byul Kim, Santosh Chilkunda +13

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models are increasingly deployed alongside Speculative Decoding (SD) to accelerate inference, but combining the two is challenging. SD improves the inferen…

cs.AI2025

MoEs Are Stronger than You Think: Hyper-Parallel Inference Scaling with RoE

Soheil Zibakhsh, Mohammad Samragh, Kumari Nishu +3

The generation quality of large language models (LLMs) is often improved by utilizing inference-time sequence-level scaling methods (e.g., Chain-of-Thought). We introduce hyper-par…

cs.CL2025

Mirror Speculative Decoding: Breaking the Serial Barrier in LLM Inference

Nikhil Bhendawade, Kumari Nishu, Arnav Kundu +3

Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference by using a draft model to look ahead, but gains are capped by the cost of autoregressive draft generation: increasing draft size elev…

cs.LG2025

MoE-PHDS: One MoE checkpoint for flexible runtime sparsity

Lauren. A Hannah, Soheil Zibakhsh, Kumari Nishu +4

Sparse Mixtures of Experts (MoEs) are typically trained to operate at a fixed sparsity level, e.g. in a top- gating function. This global sparsity level determines an operat…

cs.CL2025

Your LLM Knows the Future: Uncovering Its Multi-Token Prediction Potential

Mohammad Samragh, Arnav Kundu, David Harrison +4

Autoregressive language models are constrained by their inherently sequential nature, generating one token at a time. This paradigm limits inference speed and parallelism, especial…

cs.CL2025

From Dense to Dynamic: Token-Difficulty Driven MoEfication of Pre-Trained LLMs

Kumari Nishu, Sachin Mehta, Samira Abnar +6

Training large language models (LLMs) for different inference constraints is computationally expensive, limiting control over efficiency-accuracy trade-offs. Moreover, once trained…

eess.AS2024

SLiCK: Exploiting Subsequences for Length-Constrained Keyword Spotting

Kumari Nishu, Minsik Cho, Devang Naik

User-defined keyword spotting on a resource-constrained edge device is challenging. However, keywords are often bounded by a maximum keyword length, which has been largely under-le…

cs.SD2023★ 4 cited

Improving vision-inspired keyword spotting using dynamic module skipping in streaming conformer encoder

Alexandre Bittar, Paul Dixon, Mohammad Samragh +2

Using a vision-inspired keyword spotting framework, we propose an architecture with input-dependent dynamic depth capable of processing streaming audio. Specifically, we extend a c…

cs.SD2023★ 1 cited

Flexible Keyword Spotting based on Homogeneous Audio-Text Embedding

Kumari Nishu, Minsik Cho, Paul Dixon +1

Spotting user-defined/flexible keywords represented in text frequently uses an expensive text encoder for joint analysis with an audio encoder in an embedding space, which can suff…

eess.AS2023

Matching Latent Encoding for Audio-Text based Keyword Spotting

Kumari Nishu, Minsik Cho, Devang Naik

Using audio and text embeddings jointly for Keyword Spotting (KWS) has shown high-quality results, but the key challenge of how to semantically align two embeddings for multi-word…