activity
20242026
collaborators

11 papers

cs.CL2026

Thesis Proposal: Toward a Human-Centered and Perspective-Aware Framework for Reproducible ML Evaluation and AI Alignment

Deepak Pandita, Christopher M. Homan

Humans play a vital role at every stage of AI development, from data collection and curation to model development and evaluation. However, humans often disagree with each other and…

cs.CL2026

RamseyGadgets: A Graph Construction Dataset for LLMs

Zohair Raza Hassan, Deepak Pandita

Constructing special graphs is an important task within graph theory and computer science. Many popular graph constructions are the result of a comprehensive exploration of relevan…

cs.CL2026

Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability

Alicia Parrish, Rajat Shinde, Sanket Badhe +57

Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances,…

cs.LG2026

Improving Reproducibility in Evaluation through Multi-Level Annotator Modeling

Deepak Pandita, Flip Korn, Chris Welty +1

As generative AI models such as large language models (LLMs) become more pervasive, ensuring the safety, robustness, and overall trustworthiness of these systems is paramount. Howe…

cs.AI2026

Learning Who Disagrees: Demographic Importance Weighting for Modeling Annotator Distributions with DiADEM

Samay U. Shetty, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Deepak Pandita +1

When humans label subjective content, they disagree, and that disagreement is not noise. It reflects genuine differences in perspective shaped by annotators' social identities and…

cs.CL2025

LPI-RIT at LeWiDi-2025: Improving Distributional Predictions via Metadata and Loss Reweighting with DisCo

Mandira Sawkar, Samay U. Shetty, Deepak Pandita +2

The Learning With Disagreements (LeWiDi) 2025 shared task aims to model annotator disagreement through soft label distribution prediction and perspectivist evaluation, which focuse…

cs.LG2025

Forest vs Tree: The Trade-off in Reproducible ML Evaluation

Deepak Pandita, Flip Korn, Chris Welty +1

Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific validation and of the authority it confers on its results. Reproducibility in machine learning evaluations leads to greater trust, co…

cs.CL2025

ProRefine: Inference-Time Prompt Refinement with Textual Feedback

Deepak Pandita, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Ankit Parag Shah +3

Agentic workflows, where multiple AI agents collaborate to accomplish complex tasks like reasoning or planning, play a substantial role in many cutting-edge commercial applications…

cs.LG2024

How Many Ratings per Item are Necessary for Reliable Significance Testing?

Christopher Homan, Flip Korn, Deepak Pandita +1

A cornerstone of machine learning evaluation is the (often hidden) assumption that model and human responses are reliable enough to evaluate models against unitary, authoritative,…

cs.CL2024

ARTICLE: Annotator Reliability Through In-Context Learning

Sujan Dutta, Deepak Pandita, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya +3

Ensuring annotator quality in training and evaluation data is a key piece of machine learning in NLP. Tasks such as sentiment analysis and offensive speech detection are intrinsica…

cs.CL2024

Rater Cohesion and Quality from a Vicarious Perspective

Deepak Pandita, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Sujan Dutta +5

Human feedback is essential for building human-centered AI systems across domains where disagreement is prevalent, such as AI safety, content moderation, or sentiment analysis. Man…