activity
20232026
most citedWith Friends Like These, Who Needs Explanations? Evaluating User Understanding of Group Recommendations

11 citations · 26 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.IR2026

Overview and Analysis of the RecSys Challenge 2026: Conversational Music Recommendation

Seungheon Doh, Sergio Oramas, Bruno Sguerra +3

The RecSys Challenge 2026 studies conversational music recommendation as a joint item recommendation and response generation problem: given a multi-turn dialogue, systems must retr…

cs.CL2026

Consensus vs. Dissent: Dynamic LLM Modeling of Subjective Preferences in Group Recommenders

Cedric Waterschoot, Nava Tintarev, Francesco Barile

Previous work in group recommender systems has demonstrated a sensitivity to the distribution of preferences within a group. Specifically, the selection of the preference aggregati…

cs.CL2025★ 3 cited

Consistent Explainers or Unreliable Narrators? Understanding LLM-generated Group Recommendations

Cedric Waterschoot, Nava Tintarev, Francesco Barile

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being implemented as joint decision-makers and explanation generators for Group Recommender Systems (GRS). In this paper, we evaluate…

cs.CL2025★ 7 cited

The Pitfalls of Growing Group Complexity: LLMs and Social Choice-Based Aggregation for Group Recommendations

Cedric Waterschoot, Nava Tintarev, Francesco Barile

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in recommender systems aimed at both individuals and groups. Previously, Group Recommender Systems (GRS) often used social cho…

cs.HC2025★ 11 cited

With Friends Like These, Who Needs Explanations? Evaluating User Understanding of Group Recommendations

Cedric Waterschoot, Raciel Yera Toledo, Nava Tintarev +1

Group Recommender Systems (GRS) employing social choice-based aggregation strategies have previously been explored in terms of perceived consensus, fairness, and satisfaction. At t…

cs.IR2025

OKRA: an Explainable, Heterogeneous, Multi-Stakeholder Job Recommender System

Roan Schellingerhout, Francesco Barile, Nava Tintarev

The use of recommender systems in the recruitment domain has been labeled as 'high-risk' in recent legislation. As a result, strict requirements regarding explainability and fairne…

cs.HC2024★ 1 cited

Bridging the Transparency Gap: Exploring Multi-Stakeholder Preferences for Targeted Advertisement Explanations

Dina Zilbershtein, Francesco Barile, Daan Odijk +1

Limited transparency in targeted advertising on online content delivery platforms can breed mistrust for both viewers (of the content and ads) and advertisers. This user study (n=8…

cs.HC2024

Creating Healthy Friction: Determining Stakeholder Requirements of Job Recommendation Explanations

Roan Schellingerhout, Francesco Barile, Nava Tintarev

The increased use of information retrieval in recruitment, primarily through job recommender systems (JRSs), can have a large impact on job seekers, recruiters, and companies. As a…

cs.IR2023★ 2 cited

Explaining Search Result Stances to Opinionated People

Z. Wu, T. Draws, F. Cau +3

People use web search engines to find information before forming opinions, which can lead to practical decisions with different levels of impact. The cognitive effort of search can…

cs.HC2023

A Co-design Study for Multi-Stakeholder Job Recommender System Explanations

Roan Schellingerhout, Francesco Barile, Nava Tintarev

Recent legislation proposals have significantly increased the demand for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in many businesses, especially in so-called `high-risk' domains,…

cs.IR2023★ 2 cited

VideolandGPT: A User Study on a Conversational Recommender System

Mateo Gutierrez Granada, Dina Zilbershtein, Daan Odijk +1

This paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can enhance recommender systems, with a specific focus on Conversational Recommender Systems that leverage user preferences…