activity
20242026
most citedIntroducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons

5 citations · 13 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

11 papers

cs.AI2026

MLCommons Jailbreak Benchmark v1.0

Carsten Maple, Cagatay Yucel, Isaac Holeman +33

Modern AI systems are designed to refuse hazardous requests. A jailbreak is a prompt crafted to bypass those safeguards and elicit outputs that the system would normally refuse to…

cs.CY2026

FLARE-AI: Flaw Reporting for AI

Shayne Longpre, Elaine Zhu, Carson Ezell +15

Flaw reporting for deployed AI systems is fundamental to identifying system failures and improving AI safety. Yet the AI reporting ecosystem is fragmented: researchers who identify…

cs.CY2026

Prioritization of Risks from Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study of 272 International Experts

Alexander K. Saeri, Jess Graham, Michael Noetel +185

Artificial intelligence poses many risks, ranging from familiar present-day harms to unprecedented and potentially catastrophic ones. Effective risk management requires prioritizat…

cs.CY2026

AI Incident Monitoring through a Public Health Lens

Sophia Abraham, Taiye Chen, Cyril Chhun +5

Artificial intelligence systems are now deployed at scale across sectors, accompanied by a growing number of real-world incidents ranging from misinformation and cybercrime to auto…

cs.CY2026

A pragmatic classification framework for AI incident monitoring

Isaak Mengesha, Branwen Owen, Charlie Collins +4

Incident monitoring can drive safety improvements in high-reliability industries and population-scale technologies, but remains underdeveloped in AI governance. Public databases ca…

cs.SE2025

Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk

Sean McGregor, Victor Lu, Vassil Tashev +8

Large language model (LLM) benchmarks inform LLM use decisions (e.g., "is this LLM safe to deploy for my use case and context?"). However, benchmarks may be rendered unreliable by…

cs.CY2025★ 4 cited

AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons

Shaona Ghosh, Heather Frase, Adina Williams +99

The rapid advancement and deployment of AI systems have created an urgent need for standard safety-evaluation frameworks. This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehen…

cs.AI2025

In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI

Shayne Longpre, Kevin Klyman, Ruth E. Appel +31

The widespread deployment of general-purpose AI (GPAI) systems introduces significant new risks. Yet the infrastructure, practices, and norms for reporting flaws in GPAI systems re…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

To Err is AI : A Case Study Informing LLM Flaw Reporting Practices

Sean McGregor, Allyson Ettinger, Nick Judd +10

In August of 2024, 495 hackers generated evaluations in an open-ended bug bounty targeting the Open Language Model (OLMo) from The Allen Institute for AI. A vendor panel staffed by…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Lessons for Editors of AI Incidents from the AI Incident Database

Kevin Paeth, Daniel Atherton, Nikiforos Pittaras +2

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly deployed across the world, they are also increasingly implicated in AI incidents - harm events to individuals and societ…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons

Bertie Vidgen, Adarsh Agrawal, Ahmed M. Ahmed +97

This paper introduces v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark, which has been created by the MLCommons AI Safety Working Group. The AI Safety Benchmark has been designed to assess the safe…