activity
20222026
most citedConcept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-Off

36 citations · 46 across the 21 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

24 papers

cs.LG2026

Harmful Partial Interventions and Benign Leakage in Concept-based Models

Gregory Verghese, Christopher J. Soelistyo, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga +2

Artificial intelligence systems deployed in high-risk settings increasingly require models that support meaningful human oversight. Concept-based models (CMs) offer a promising fra…

cs.LG2026

Persistent Sparse Autoencoders: Learning Feature-Specific Timescales in Language Model Representations

Haoyan Luo, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose language model activations into sparse features, yet these models traditionally encode each token independently, failing to expose information…

cs.LG2026

In Defense of Information Leakage in Concept-based Models

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga

Concept-based models (CMs), deep neural networks that ground their predictions on representations aligned with human-understandable concepts (e.g., "round", "stripes", etc.), have…

cs.LG2026

The Standard Interpretable Model: A general theory of interpretable machine learning to deductively design interpretable methods using Lagrangian mechanics

Pietro Barbiero, Giovanni De Felice, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga +5

As Artificial Intelligence models grow in complexity, interpretability has become an indispensable tool for understanding, debugging, and controlling their computations. However, i…

cs.LG2026

CB-SLICE: Concept-Based Interpretable Error Slice Discovery

Yael Konforti, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Elaf Almahmoud +1

Despite strong average-case performance, deep learning models often exhibit systematic errors on specific population groups, known as error slices. Identifying these groups and the…

cs.CL2026

Don't Lose Focus: Activation Steering via Key-Orthogonal Projections

Haoyan Luo, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik

Activation steering controls LLM behaviour towards target behaviour by intervening in internal representations, yet it often degrades reasoning and retrieval performance. We argue…

cs.LG2026

Digging Deeper: Learning Multi-Level Concept Hierarchies

Oscar Hill, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik

Although concept-based models promise interpretability by explaining predictions with human-understandable concepts, they typically rely on exhaustive annotations and treat concept…

cs.LG2026

Hierarchical Concept-based Interpretable Models

Oscar Hill, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik

Modern deep neural networks remain challenging to interpret due to the opacity of their latent representations, impeding model understanding, debugging, and debiasing. Concept Embe…

cs.LG2026

Mixture of Concept Bottleneck Experts

Francesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giovanni De Felice +7

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) promote interpretability by grounding predictions in human-understandable concepts. However, existing CBMs typically constrain their task predictor…

cs.AI2026

Actionable Interpretability Must Be Defined in Terms of Symmetries

Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Francesco Giannini +4

This paper argues that interpretability research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fundamentally ill-posed as existing definitions of interpretability fail to describe how interpr…

cs.LG2025

Foundations of Interpretable Models

Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Alberto Termine +2

We argue that existing definitions of interpretability are not actionable in that they fail to inform users about general, sound, and robust interpretable model design. This makes…

cs.LG2025

Addressing Concept Mislabeling in Concept Bottleneck Models Through Preference Optimization

Emiliano Penaloza, Tianyue H. Zhang, Laurent Charlin +1

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) propose to enhance the trustworthiness of AI systems by constraining their decisions on a set of human-understandable concepts. However, CBMs typic…

cs.LG2025

Avoiding Leakage Poisoning: Concept Interventions Under Distribution Shifts

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero +2

In this paper, we investigate how concept-based models (CMs) respond to out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. CMs are interpretable neural architectures that first predict a set of hig…

cs.LG2025

Deferring Concept Bottleneck Models: Learning to Defer Interventions to Inaccurate Experts

Andrea Pugnana, Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Giannini +6

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are machine learning models that improve interpretability by grounding their predictions on human-understandable concepts, allowing for targeted in…

cs.LG2025

Neural Interpretable Reasoning

Pietro Barbiero, Giuseppe Marra, Gabriele Ciravegna +5

We formalize a novel modeling framework for achieving interpretability in deep learning, anchored in the principle of inference equivariance. While the direct verification of inter…

cs.LG2024

Efficient Bias Mitigation Without Privileged Information

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Jerone T. A. Andrews +3

Deep neural networks trained via empirical risk minimisation often exhibit significant performance disparities across groups, particularly when group and task labels are spuriously…

cs.LG2024

Understanding Inter-Concept Relationships in Concept-Based Models

Naveen Raman, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja Jamnik

Concept-based explainability methods provide insight into deep learning systems by constructing explanations using human-understandable concepts. While the literature on human reas…

cs.LG2024

Causal Concept Graph Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning

Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga +4

Causal opacity denotes the difficulty in understanding the "hidden" causal structure underlying the decisions of deep neural network (DNN) models. This leads to the inability to re…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Do Concept Bottleneck Models Respect Localities?

Naveen Raman, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Juyeon Heo +1

Concept-based explainability methods use human-understandable intermediaries to produce explanations for machine learning models. These methods assume concept predictions can help…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Learning to Receive Help: Intervention-Aware Concept Embedding Models

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Katherine M. Collins, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham +3

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) tackle the opacity of neural architectures by constructing and explaining their predictions using a set of high-level concepts. A special property…

cs.AI2023

Interpretable Neural-Symbolic Concept Reasoning

Pietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna, Francesco Giannini +7

Deep learning methods are highly accurate, yet their opaque decision process prevents them from earning full human trust. Concept-based models aim to address this issue by learning…

cs.HC2023

Human Uncertainty in Concept-Based AI Systems

Katherine M. Collins, Matthew Barker, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga +6

Placing a human in the loop may abate the risks of deploying AI systems in safety-critical settings (e.g., a clinician working with a medical AI system). However, mitigating risks…

cs.LG2023★ 6 cited

Towards Robust Metrics for Concept Representation Evaluation

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Pietro Barbiero, Zohreh Shams +4

Recent work on interpretability has focused on concept-based explanations, where deep learning models are explained in terms of high-level units of information, referred to as conc…

cs.LG2022★ 36 cited

Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-Off

Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Pietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna +9

Deploying AI-powered systems requires trustworthy models supporting effective human interactions, going beyond raw prediction accuracy. Concept bottleneck models promote trustworth…