activity
20232026
most citedWhy do explanations fail? A typology and discussion on failures in XAI

4 citations · 6 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

Diversified and Perceptible Counterfactual Examples Leveraging Expert Knowledge

Akram Bensalem, Fahima Djelil, Marie-Jeanne Lesot +1

CounterFactual Examples (CFEs) are a cornerstone of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), offering local, post hoc, and model-agnostic explanations by identifying minimal inpu…

cs.AI2026

Aggregative Semantics for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

Yann Munro, Isabelle Bloch, Marie-Jeanne Lesot

Formal argumentation is being used increasingly in artificial intelligence as an effective and understandable way to model potentially conflicting pieces of information, called arg…

cs.AI2025

Metric assessment protocol in the context of answer fluctuation on MCQ tasks

Ekaterina Goliakova, Xavier Renard, Marie-Jeanne Lesot +3

Using multiple-choice questions (MCQs) has become a standard for assessing LLM capabilities efficiently. A variety of metrics can be employed for this task. However, previous resea…

cs.AI2024

An action language-based formalisation of an abstract argumentation framework

Yann Munro, Camilo Sarmiento, Isabelle Bloch +3

An abstract argumentation framework is a commonly used formalism to provide a static representation of a dialogue. However, the order of enunciation of the arguments in an argument…

cs.AI2023

Integrating Temporality and Causality into Acyclic Argumentation Frameworks using a Transition System

Y. Munro, C. Sarmiento, I. Bloch +2

In the context of abstract argumentation, we present the benefits of considering temporality, i.e. the order in which arguments are enunciated, as well as causality. We propose a f…