activity
20232026
most citedWhat Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?

5 citations · 40 across the 105 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

33 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

M4FC: a Multimodal, Multilingual, Multicultural, Multitask Real-World Fact-Checking Dataset

Jiahui Geng, Jonathan Tonglet, Iryna Gurevych

Existing real-world datasets for multimodal fact-checking have multiple limitations: they contain few instances, cover only one or two languages, focus on a single task, or rely on…

cs.CL2025

Citation Failure: Definition, Analysis and Efficient Mitigation

Jan Buchmann, Iryna Gurevych

Citations from LLM-based RAG systems are supposed to simplify response verification. However, this goal is undermined in cases of citation failure, where a model generates a helpfu…

cs.AI2025

Hypothesis-Driven Feature Manifold Analysis in LLMs via Supervised Multi-Dimensional Scaling

Federico Tiblias, Irina Bigoulaeva, Jingcheng Niu +2

The linear representation hypothesis states that language models (LMs) encode concepts as directions in their latent space, forming organized, multidimensional manifolds. Prior wor…

cs.CL2025

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors

Abdelrahman Sadallah, Tim Baumgärtner, Iryna Gurevych +1

Providing constructive feedback to paper authors is a core component of peer review. With reviewers increasingly having less time to perform reviews, automated support systems are…

cs.CL2025

Towards Automated Error Discovery: A Study in Conversational AI

Dominic Petrak, Thy Thy Tran, Iryna Gurevych

Although LLM-based conversational agents demonstrate strong fluency and coherence, they still produce undesirable behaviors (errors) that are challenging to prevent from reaching u…

cs.CL2025

ABCD-LINK: Annotation Bootstrapping for Cross-Document Fine-Grained Links

Serwar Basch, Ilia Kuznetsov, Tom Hope +1

Understanding fine-grained links between documents is crucial for many applications, yet progress is limited by the lack of efficient methods for data curation. To address this lim…

cs.SE2025

: A Resource Suite for AI-Generated Code Detection

Daniil Orel, Indraneil Paul, Iryna Gurevych +1

In this work, we compile $\textbf{$\texttt{DroidCollection}$}$, the most extensive open data suite for training and evaluating machine-generated code detectors, comprising over a m…

cs.CL2025

Is this chart lying to me? Automating the detection of misleading visualizations

Jonathan Tonglet, Jan Zimny, Tinne Tuytelaars +1

Misleading visualizations are a potent driver of misinformation on social media and the web. By violating chart design principles, they distort data and lead readers to draw inaccu…

cs.CL2025

Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation Framework

Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych

Large Language Models (LLMs) have great potential to accelerate and support scholarly peer review and are increasingly used as fully automatic review generators (ARGs). However, po…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safety

Luke Bates, Max Glockner, Preslav Nakov +1

Conspiracy theories erode public trust in science and institutions while resisting debunking by evolving and absorbing counter-evidence. As AI-generated misinformation becomes incr…

cs.CL2025

How Quantization Shapes Bias in Large Language Models

Federico Marcuzzi, Xuefei Ning, Roy Schwartz +1

This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of how quantization affects model bias, with particular attention to its impact on individual demographic subgroups. We focus on weigh…

cs.CL2025

Beyond "Not Novel Enough": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback

Osama Mohammed Afzal, Preslav Nakov, Tom Hope +1

Novelty assessment is a central yet understudied aspect of peer review, particularly in high volume fields like NLP where reviewer capacity is increasingly strained. We present a s…

cs.HC2025

Pull Requests From The Classroom: Co-Developing Curriculum And Code

Dennis Zyska, Ilia Kuznetsov, Florian Müller +1

Educational technologies often misalign with instructors' pedagogical goals, forcing adaptations that compromise teaching efficacy. In this paper, we present a case study on the co…

cs.IR2025

Revela: Dense Retriever Learning via Language Modeling

Fengyu Cai, Tong Chen, Xinran Zhao +5

Dense retrievers play a vital role in accessing external and specialized knowledge to augment language models (LMs). Training dense retrievers typically requires annotated query-do…

cs.CL2025

SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling

Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych

Process or step-wise supervision has played a crucial role in advancing complex multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, efficient, high-quality…

cs.CR2025

Con Instruction: Universal Jailbreaking of Multimodal Large Language Models via Non-Textual Modalities

Jiahui Geng, Thy Thy Tran, Preslav Nakov +1

Existing attacks against multimodal language models (MLLMs) primarily communicate instructions through text accompanied by adversarial images. In contrast, we exploit the capabilit…

cs.CL2025

Factual Self-Awareness in Language Models: Representation, Robustness, and Scaling

Hovhannes Tamoyan, Subhabrata Dutta, Iryna Gurevych

Factual incorrectness in generated content is one of the primary concerns in ubiquitous deployment of large language models (LLMs). Prior findings suggest LLMs can (sometimes) dete…

cs.SI2025★ 2 cited

Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media

Isabelle Augenstein, Michiel Bakker, Tanmoy Chakraborty +13

Social media platforms have traditionally relied on internal moderation teams and partnerships with independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.…

cs.CL2025

NeoQA: Evidence-based Question Answering with Generated News Events

Max Glockner, Xiang Jiang, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro +2

Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in large language models (LLMs) is challenging because benchmarks can quickly become stale. Questions initially requiring retrieval…

cs.CL2025

Illusion or Algorithm? Investigating Memorization, Emergence, and Symbolic Processing in In-Context Learning

Jingcheng Niu, Subhabrata Dutta, Ahmed Elshabrawy +2

Large-scale Transformer language models (LMs) trained solely on next-token prediction with web-scale data can solve a wide range of tasks after seeing just a few examples. The mech…

cs.CL2025

Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews

Sheng Lu, Ilia Kuznetsov, Iryna Gurevych

Peer review is central to academic publishing, but the growing volume of submissions is straining the process. This motivates the development of computational approaches to support…

cs.CL2025

Can LLMs Automate Fact-Checking Article Writing?

Dhruv Sahnan, David Corney, Irene Larraz +7

Automatic fact-checking aims to support professional fact-checkers by offering tools that can help speed up manual fact-checking. Yet, existing frameworks fail to address the key s…

cs.CL2025

GenAI Content Detection Task 1: English and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection: AI vs. Human

Yuxia Wang, Artem Shelmanov, Jonibek Mansurov +23

We present the GenAI Content Detection Task~1 -- a shared task on binary machine generated text detection, conducted as a part of the GenAI workshop at COLING 2025. The task consis…

cs.CL2025

PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews

Tim Baumgärtner, Ted Briscoe, Iryna Gurevych

We present PeerQA, a real-world, scientific, document-level Question Answering (QA) dataset. PeerQA questions have been sourced from peer reviews, which contain questions that revi…