4 citations · 8 across the 19 of their papers we have counts for
7 papers · 2 filters
Format Matters: The Robustness of Multimodal LLMs in Reviewing Evidence from Tables and Charts
Xanh Ho, Yun-Ang Wu, Sunisth Kumar +3
With the growing number of submitted scientific papers, there is an increasing demand for systems that can assist reviewers in evaluating research claims. Experimental results are…
Repurposing Annotation Guidelines to Instruct LLM Annotators: A Case Study
Kon Woo Kim, Rezarta Islamaj, Jin-Dong Kim +2
This study investigates how existing annotation guidelines can be repurposed to instruct large language model (LLM) annotators for text annotation tasks. Traditional guidelines are…
Automatically Suggesting Diverse Example Sentences for L2 Japanese Learners Using Pre-Trained Language Models
Enrico Benedetti, Akiko Aizawa, Florian Boudin
Providing example sentences that are diverse and aligned with learners' proficiency levels is essential for fostering effective language acquisition. This study examines the use of…
Table-Text Alignment: Explaining Claim Verification Against Tables in Scientific Papers
Xanh Ho, Sunisth Kumar, Yun-Ang Wu +3
Scientific claim verification against tables typically requires predicting whether a claim is supported or refuted given a table. However, we argue that predicting the final label…
Identifying Reliable Evaluation Metrics for Scientific Text Revision
Léane Jourdan, Florian Boudin, Richard Dufour +1
Evaluating text revision in scientific writing remains a challenge, as traditional metrics such as ROUGE and BERTScore primarily focus on similarity rather than capturing meaningfu…
Reassessing Extractive QA Datasets at Scale: LLM-as-a-Judge and In-Depth Analyses
Xanh Ho, Jiahao Huang, Florian Boudin +1
Extractive QA tasks are commonly evaluated using Exact Match (EM) and F1-score, but these metrics often fail to reflect true model performance. Recent studies have proposed using l…
ParaRev: Building a dataset for Scientific Paragraph Revision annotated with revision instruction
Léane Jourdan, Nicolas Hernandez, Richard Dufour +2
Revision is a crucial step in scientific writing, where authors refine their work to improve clarity, structure, and academic quality. Existing approaches to automated writing assi…