activity
20242026
most citedGemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size

145 citations · 309 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

13 papers

cs.CL2026

CT: Counterfactual Causal Reasoning for Sentiment Shifts in Social-Media Conversation Trees

S M Rafiuddin, Atriya Sen

Sentiment in social-media threads does not only vary across posts; it shifts as users react to claims, corrections, evidence, and hostility within a branching reply tree. We study…

cs.CL2026★ 3 cited

Gemma 4 Technical Report

Gemma Team, Sherif El Abd, Vaibhav Aggarwal +320

We introduce Gemma 4, a new generation of open-weight, natively multimodal language models in the Gemma model family. Designed to advance compute efficiency and reasoning, the Gemm…

cs.CL2025★ 49 cited

Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann +3431

In this report, we introduce the Gemini 2.X model family: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash, as well as our earlier Gemini 2.0 Flash and Flash-Lite models. Gemini 2.5 Pro is our…

cs.AI2025★ 41 cited

MedGemma Technical Report

Andrew Sellergren, Sahar Kazemzadeh, Tiam Jaroensri +78

Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant potential in healthcare applications, but its training and deployment faces challenges due to healthcare's diverse data, complex tasks,…

cs.CL2025★ 65 cited

Gemma 3 Technical Report

Gemma Team, Aishwarya Kamath, Johan Ferret +209

We introduce Gemma 3, a multimodal addition to the Gemma family of lightweight open models, ranging in scale from 1 to 27 billion parameters. This version introduces vision underst…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

On Teacher Hacking in Language Model Distillation

Daniil Tiapkin, Daniele Calandriello, Johan Ferret +4

Post-training of language models (LMs) increasingly relies on the following two stages: (i) knowledge distillation, where the LM is trained to imitate a larger teacher LM, and (ii)…

cs.CL2025

Streaming DiLoCo with overlapping communication: Towards a Distributed Free Lunch

Arthur Douillard, Yanislav Donchev, Keith Rush +11

Training of large language models (LLMs) is typically distributed across a large number of accelerators to reduce training time. Since internal states and parameter gradients need…

cs.LG2024

Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillation

Geoffrey Cideron, Andrea Agostinelli, Johan Ferret +5

Generative models are transforming creative domains such as music generation, with inference-time strategies like Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) playing a crucial role. However, CF…

cs.CL2024★ 145 cited

Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size

Gemma Team, Morgane Riviere, Shreya Pathak +195

In this work, we introduce Gemma 2, a new addition to the Gemma family of lightweight, state-of-the-art open models, ranging in scale from 2 billion to 27 billion parameters. In th…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

BOND: Aligning LLMs with Best-of-N Distillation

Pier Giuseppe Sessa, Robert Dadashi, Léonard Hussenot +17

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a key driver of quality and safety in state-of-the-art large language models. Yet, a surprisingly simple and strong inference-t…

cs.LG2024

Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuning

Kaiwen Wang, Rahul Kidambi, Ryan Sullivan +17

Reward-based finetuning is crucial for aligning language policies with intended behaviors (e.g., creativity and safety). A key challenge is to develop steerable language models tha…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

WARP: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Rewarded Policies

Alexandre Ramé, Johan Ferret, Nino Vieillard +7

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) aligns large language models (LLMs) by encouraging their generations to have high rewards, using a reward model trained on human p…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Models

Alexandre Ramé, Nino Vieillard, Léonard Hussenot +4

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences through reinforcement learning (RLHF) can lead to reward hacking, where LLMs exploit failures in the reward model (RM)…