activity
20232025
most citedModel evaluation for extreme risks

59 citations · 72 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety

Tomek Korbak, Mikita Balesni, Elizabeth Barnes +38

AI systems that "think" in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety: we can monitor their chains of thought (CoT) for the intent to misbehave. Like all other known A…

cs.CR2024★ 2 cited

Towards evaluations-based safety cases for AI scheming

Mikita Balesni, Marius Hobbhahn, David Lindner +13

We sketch how developers of frontier AI systems could construct a structured rationale -- a 'safety case' -- that an AI system is unlikely to cause catastrophic outcomes through sc…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactions

Angana Borah, Rada Mihalcea

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they are increasingly being employed in numerous studies to simulate societies and execute diverse social tasks. However, LLMs a…

cs.CL2023★ 8 cited

Taken out of context: On measuring situational awareness in LLMs

Lukas Berglund, Asa Cooper Stickland, Mikita Balesni +5

We aim to better understand the emergence of `situational awareness' in large language models (LLMs). A model is situationally aware if it's aware that it's a model and can recogni…

cs.AI2023★ 59 cited

Model evaluation for extreme risks

Toby Shevlane, Sebastian Farquhar, Ben Garfinkel +18

Current approaches to building general-purpose AI systems tend to produce systems with both beneficial and harmful capabilities. Further progress in AI development could lead to ca…

cs.CL2023

GPT-4 Technical Report

OpenAI, Josh Achiam, Steven Adler +278

We report the development of GPT-4, a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. While less capable than humans in many real-wor…