activity
20242026
collaborators
Showing cs.AIShow all

7 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2026

Cycle-Consistent Neural Explanation of Formal Verification Certificates

Andoni Rodriguez, Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo

Formal verification produces machine-checkable certificates that attest to the satisfaction or violation of temporal properties, yet these certificates remain opaque to non-special…

cs.AI2026

Semantic Partial Grounding via LLMs

Giuseppe Canonaco, Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo

Grounding is a critical step in classical planning, yet it often becomes a computational bottleneck due to the exponential growth in grounded actions and atoms as task size increas…

cs.AI2026

Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planning

Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo, Manuela Veloso

Automated planning traditionally assumes that all aspects of a planning task (initial state, goals, and available actions) are fully specified in advance, an approach well-suited t…

cs.AI2026

Planning Task Shielding: Detecting and Repairing Flaws in Planning Tasks through Turning them Unsolvable

Alberto Pozanco, Marianela Morales, Pietro Totis +1

Most research in planning focuses on generating a plan to achieve a desired set of goals. However, a goal specification can also be used to encode a property that should never hold…

cs.AI2025

Unveiling Interesting Insights: Monte Carlo Tree Search for Knowledge Discovery

Pietro Totis, Alberto Pozanco, Daniel Borrajo

Organizations are increasingly focused on leveraging data from their processes to gain insights and drive decision-making. However, converting this data into actionable knowledge r…

cs.AI2025

GenPlanX. Generation of Plans and Execution

Daniel Borrajo, Giuseppe Canonaco, Tomás de la Rosa +10

Classical AI Planning techniques generate sequences of actions for complex tasks. However, they lack the ability to understand planning tasks when provided using natural language.…