activity
20232026
most citedINSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedback

4 citations · 10 across the 23 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2025Show all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2025

MetricX-25 and GemSpanEval: Google Translate Submissions to the WMT25 Evaluation Shared Task

Juraj Juraska, Tobias Domhan, Mara Finkelstein +5

In this paper, we present our submissions to the unified WMT25 Translation Evaluation Shared Task. For the Quality Score Prediction subtask, we create a new generation of MetricX w…

cs.CL2025

MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation

Parker Riley, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein +3

Human evaluation of machine translation is in an arms race with translation model quality: as our models get better, our evaluation methods need to be improved to ensure that quali…

cs.CL2025

Generating Difficult-to-Translate Texts

Vilém Zouhar, Wenda Xu, Parker Riley +4

Machine translation benchmarks sourced from the real world are quickly obsoleted, due to most examples being easy for state-of-the-art translation models. This limits the benchmark…

cs.CL2025

Penalizing Length: Uncovering Systematic Bias in Quality Estimation Metrics

Yilin Zhang, Wenda Xu, Zhongtao Liu +2

Quality Estimation (QE) metrics are vital in machine translation for reference-free evaluation and increasingly serve as selection criteria in data filtering and candidate rerankin…

cs.CL2025

Feeding Two Birds or Favoring One? Adequacy-Fluency Tradeoffs in Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation of Machine Translation

Behzad Shayegh, Jan-Thorsten Peter, David Vilar +4

We investigate the tradeoff between adequacy and fluency in machine translation. We show the severity of this tradeoff at the evaluation level and analyze where popular metrics fal…

cs.CL2025

Searching the Internet for Challenging Benchmarks at Scale

Wenda Xu, Vilém Zouhar, Parker Riley +3

Many static benchmarks are beginning to saturate: as models rapidly improve, they achieve near-perfect scores on fixed test sets, leaving little headroom to expose genuine model we…

cs.CL2025

When LLMs Benchmark Themselves: Deconstructing Self-Bias in Automated Evaluation

Wenda Xu, Sweta Agrawal, Vilém Zouhar +2

As LLMs rapidly saturate existing benchmarks, automated benchmark creation using LLMs (LLM as a benchmark) where a model generates test inputs (LLM as a testset) and evaluates outp…

cs.CL2025

Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative Judgment

Yixiao Song, Parker Riley, Daniel Deutsch +1

Human evaluation is crucial for assessing rapidly evolving language models but is influenced by annotator proficiency and task design. This study explores the integration of compar…

cs.CL2025

WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialects

Daniel Deutsch, Eleftheria Briakou, Isaac Caswell +14

As large language models (LLM) become more and more capable in languages other than English, it is important to collect benchmark datasets in order to evaluate their multilingual p…