activity
20232026
most citedTencentLLMEval: A Hierarchical Evaluation of Real-World Capabilities for Human-Aligned LLMs

2 citations · 3 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?

Yangda Peng, Yunjia Qi, Haotian Xia +8

Rubric-based scoring has become a widely used paradigm in model evaluation, typically with LLM-as-a-Judge (LaaJ) for rubric scoring. However, the reliability of LaaJ for rubric sco…

cs.CL2026

UltraLogic: Enhancing LLM Reasoning through Large-Scale Data Synthesis and Bipolar Float Reward

Yile Liu, Yixian Liu, Zongwei Li +7

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in natural language processing , complex general-purpose reasoning requiring multi-step logic, planning,…

cs.CL2026

EternalMath: A Living Benchmark of Frontier Mathematics that Evolves with Human Discovery

Jicheng Ma, Guohua Wang, Xinhua Feng +3

Current evaluations of mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) are dominated by static benchmarks, either derived from competition-style problems or curated through…

cs.CL2024

IDGen: Item Discrimination Induced Prompt Generation for LLM Evaluation

Fan Lin, Shuyi Xie, Yong Dai +7

As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow increasingly adept at managing complex tasks, the evaluation set must keep pace with these advancements to ensure it remains sufficiently discr…

cs.CL2023★ 2 cited

TencentLLMEval: A Hierarchical Evaluation of Real-World Capabilities for Human-Aligned LLMs

Shuyi Xie, Wenlin Yao, Yong Dai +11

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across various natural language tasks. However, evaluating their alignment with human preferences remains a challeng…