1 citations · 1 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for
9 papers
Hardening Agent Benchmarks with Adversarial Hacker-Fixer Loops
Ziqian Zhong, Ivgeni Segal, Ivan Bercovich +3
Agent benchmarks score submissions with outcome verifiers that are typically hand-written and brittle, leaving them open to reward hacking. We audit 1,968 tasks across five termina…
Base Models Look Human To AI Detectors
Yixuan Even Xu, Ziqian Zhong, Aditi Raghunathan +2
As AI-generated text enters the real-world at scale, institutions increasingly use commercial AI-text detectors, especially in education and academic-integrity workflows. We report…
Terminal Wrench: A Dataset of 331 Reward-Hackable Environments and 3,632 Exploit Trajectories
Ivan Bercovich, Ivgeni Segal, Kexun Zhang +3
We release Terminal Wrench, a subset of 331 terminal-agent benchmark environments, copied from the popular open benchmarks that are demonstrably reward-hackable. The data set inclu…
Hodoscope: Unsupervised Monitoring for AI Misbehaviors
Ziqian Zhong, Shashwat Saxena, Aditi Raghunathan
Existing approaches to monitoring AI agents rely on supervised evaluation: human-written rules or LLM-based judges that check for known failure modes. However, novel misbehaviors m…
Pando: Do Interpretability Methods Work When Models Won't Explain Themselves?
Ziqian Zhong, Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab +2
Mechanistic interpretability is often motivated for alignment auditing, where a model's verbal explanations can be absent, incomplete, or misleading. Yet many evaluations do not co…
Jailbreaking in the Haystack
Rishi Rajesh Shah, Chen Henry Wu, Shashwat Saxena +3
Recent advances in long-context language models (LMs) have enabled million-token inputs, expanding their capabilities across complex tasks like computer-use agents. Yet, the safety…