activity
20232026
most citedEvaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

11 citations · 23 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

Debate Training Reduces Reward Hacking in RLAIF

Zachary Kenton, Lili Janzer, Rory Greig +8

We demonstrate that RL finetuning an LLM using debate, a two-player adversarial game between a generator and a critic adjudicated by a weaker LLM judge, reduces reward hacking comp…

cs.LG2026

How Transparent is DiffusionGemma?

Joshua Engels, Callum McDougall, Bilal Chughtai +11

LLM reasoning transparency is a critical affordance for understanding model decisions, mitigating misuse and misalignment, and debugging surprising model behaviors. However, Diffus…

cs.LG2026

Building Production-Ready Probes For Gemini

János Kramár, Joshua Engels, Zheng Wang +4

Frontier language model capabilities are improving rapidly. We thus need stronger mitigations against bad actors misusing increasingly powerful systems. Prior work has shown that a…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders for Monosemantic Representation

Moghis Fereidouni, Muhammad Umair Haider, Peizhong Ju +1

A key barrier to interpreting large language models is polysemanticity, where neurons activate for multiple unrelated concepts. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have been proposed to mit…

cs.LG2025

MONA: Myopic Optimization with Non-myopic Approval Can Mitigate Multi-step Reward Hacking

Sebastian Farquhar, Vikrant Varma, David Lindner +4

Future advanced AI systems may learn sophisticated strategies through reinforcement learning (RL) that humans cannot understand well enough to safely evaluate. We propose a trainin…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2

Tom Lieberum, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy +7

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an unsupervised method for learning a sparse decomposition of a neural network's latent representations into seemingly interpretable features. Despit…

cs.LG2024★ 6 cited

On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMs

Zachary Kenton, Noah Y. Siegel, János Kramár +8

Scalable oversight protocols aim to enable humans to accurately supervise superhuman AI. In this paper we study debate, where two AI's compete to convince a judge; consultancy, whe…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders

Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith +5

Recent work has found that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an effective technique for unsupervised discovery of interpretable features in language models' (LMs) activations, by find…

cs.LG2024★ 11 cited

Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

Mary Phuong, Matthew Aitchison, Elliot Catt +24

To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evalu…

cs.LG2024

AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to components

János Kramár, Tom Lieberum, Rohin Shah +1

Activation Patching is a method of directly computing causal attributions of behavior to model components. However, applying it exhaustively requires a sweep with cost scaling line…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Challenges with unsupervised LLM knowledge discovery

Sebastian Farquhar, Vikrant Varma, Zachary Kenton +3

We show that existing unsupervised methods on large language model (LLM) activations do not discover knowledge -- instead they seem to discover whatever feature of the activations…