activity
20222026
most citedFine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!

41 citations · 72 across the 28 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

28 papers

cs.CL2026

Context-Aware RL for Agentic and Multimodal LLMs

Peiyang Xu, Bangzheng Li, Sijia Liu +4

Large language models (LLMs) often fail when answering requires identifying a small but decisive piece of evidence within a long or complex context, such as a single line in a tool…

cs.LG2026

Rapid Poison: Practical Poisoning Attacks Against the Rapid Response Framework

David Huang, Jaewon Chang, Avidan Shah +2

The Rapid Response (RR) framework, deployed in production systems, including Anthropic's ASL-3 safeguards, continuously improves jailbreak-detection classifiers. When new jailbreak…

cs.LG2025

Can Small Training Runs Reliably Guide Data Curation? Rethinking Proxy-Model Practice

Jiachen T. Wang, Tong Wu, Kaifeng Lyu +4

Data teams at frontier AI companies routinely train small proxy models to make critical decisions about pretraining data recipes for full-scale training runs. However, the communit…

cs.CR2025

ReliabilityRAG: Effective and Provably Robust Defense for RAG-based Web-Search

Zeyu Shen, Basileal Imana, Tong Wu +3

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models by grounding their outputs in external documents. These systems, however, remain vulnerable to attacks on the re…

cs.AI2025

Does More Inference-Time Compute Really Help Robustness?

Tong Wu, Chong Xiang, Jiachen T. Wang +4

Recently, Zaremba et al. demonstrated that increasing inference-time computation improves robustness in large proprietary reasoning LLMs. In this paper, we first show that smaller-…

cs.CR2025

PatchDEMUX: A Certifiably Robust Framework for Multi-label Classifiers Against Adversarial Patches

Dennis Jacob, Chong Xiang, Prateek Mittal

Deep learning techniques have enabled vast improvements in computer vision technologies. Nevertheless, these models are vulnerable to adversarial patch attacks which catastrophical…

cs.CR2025★ 2 cited

Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models

Ashwinee Panda, Xinyu Tang, Milad Nasr +2

Current techniques for privacy auditing of large language models (LLMs) have limited efficacy -- they rely on basic approaches to generate canaries which leads to weak membership i…

cs.LG2025

Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention

Tong Wu, Chong Xiang, Jiachen T. Wang +2

Reasoning-enhanced large language models (LLMs) explicitly generate intermediate reasoning steps prior to generating final answers, helping the model excel in complex problem-solvi…

cs.SD2025

The Model Hears You: Audio Language Model Deployments Should Consider the Principle of Least Privilege

Luxi He, Xiangyu Qi, Michel Liao +4

The latest Audio Language Models (Audio LMs) process speech directly instead of relying on a separate transcription step. This shift preserves detailed information, such as intonat…

cs.LG2025

Adapting to Evolving Adversaries with Regularized Continual Robust Training

Sihui Dai, Christian Cianfarani, Arjun Bhagoji +2

Robust training methods typically defend against specific attack types, such as Lp attacks with fixed budgets, and rarely account for the fact that defenders may encounter new atta…

cs.LG2024

Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influence

Jiachen T. Wang, Dawn Song, James Zou +2

Traditional data influence estimation methods, like influence function, assume that learning algorithms are permutation-invariant with respect to training data. However, modern tra…

cs.CR2024

On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs

Xiangyu Qi, Boyi Wei, Nicholas Carlini +7

Stakeholders -- from model developers to policymakers -- seek to minimize the dual-use risks of large language models (LLMs). An open challenge to this goal is whether technical sa…

cs.LG2024

Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction Hierarchy

Tong Wu, Shujian Zhang, Kaiqiang Song +7

Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to security and safety threats, such as prompt injection, prompt extraction, and harmful requests. One major cause of these vulnerabili…

cs.CL2024

Lottery Ticket Adaptation: Mitigating Destructive Interference in LLMs

Ashwinee Panda, Berivan Isik, Xiangyu Qi +3

Existing methods for adapting large language models (LLMs) to new tasks are not suited to multi-task adaptation because they modify all the model weights -- causing destructive int…

cs.CR2024★ 4 cited

Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep

Xiangyu Qi, Ashwinee Panda, Kaifeng Lyu +5

The safety alignment of current Large Language Models (LLMs) is vulnerable. Relatively simple attacks, or even benign fine-tuning, can jailbreak aligned models. We argue that many…

cs.AI2024★ 6 cited

SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal

Tinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng +13

Evaluating aligned large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests is crucial for safe, policy-compliant deployments. Existing evaluation efforts…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Data Shapley in One Training Run

Jiachen T. Wang, Prateek Mittal, Dawn Song +1

Data Shapley provides a principled framework for attributing data's contribution within machine learning contexts. However, existing approaches require re-training models on differ…

cs.CR2024★ 2 cited

AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security

Xiangyu Qi, Yangsibo Huang, Yi Zeng +22

The exposure of security vulnerabilities in safety-aligned language models, e.g., susceptibility to adversarial attacks, has shed light on the intricate interplay between AI safety…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs

Yuval Reif, Roy Schwartz

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable adaptability to diverse tasks, by leveraging context prompts containing instructions, or minimal input-output examples. However,…

cs.LG2024★ 5 cited

Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption

Chong Xiang, Tong Wu, Zexuan Zhong +3

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is susceptible to retrieval corruption attacks, where malicious passages injected into retrieval results can lead to inaccurate model responses…

cs.LG2024

Position: Towards Resilience Against Adversarial Examples

Sihui Dai, Chong Xiang, Tong Wu +1

Current research on defending against adversarial examples focuses primarily on achieving robustness against a single attack type such as or -bounded attack…

cs.CR2024★ 3 cited

Teach LLMs to Phish: Stealing Private Information from Language Models

Ashwinee Panda, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Zhengming Zhang +2

When large language models are trained on private data, it can be a significant privacy risk for them to memorize and regurgitate sensitive information. In this work, we propose a…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications

Boyi Wei, Kaixuan Huang, Yangsibo Huang +6

Large language models (LLMs) show inherent brittleness in their safety mechanisms, as evidenced by their susceptibility to jailbreaking and even non-malicious fine-tuning. This stu…

cs.DS2024

Efficient Data Shapley for Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithms

Jiachen T. Wang, Prateek Mittal, Ruoxi Jia

This work aims to address an open problem in data valuation literature concerning the efficient computation of Data Shapley for weighted nearest neighbor algorithm (WKNN-Shaple…