most citedTemporal True and Surrogate Fitness Landscape Analysis for Expensive Bi-Objective Optimisation

2 citations · 2 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.NE2024

Stalling in Space: Attractor Analysis for any Algorithm

Sarah L. Thomson, Quentin Renau, Diederick Vermetten +3

Network-based representations of fitness landscapes have grown in popularity in the past decade; this is probably because of growing interest in explainability for optimisation alg…

cs.NE2024

A Deep Dive into Effects of Structural Bias on CMA-ES Performance along Affine Trajectories

Niki van Stein, Sarah L. Thomson, Anna V. Kononova

To guide the design of better iterative optimisation heuristics, it is imperative to understand how inherent structural biases within algorithm components affect the performance on…

cs.NE20242 cited

Temporal True and Surrogate Fitness Landscape Analysis for Expensive Bi-Objective Optimisation

C. J. Rodriguez, S. L. Thomson, T. Alderliesten +1

Many real-world problems have expensive-to-compute fitness functions and are multi-objective in nature. Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms are often used to tackle such pro…

cs.AI2024

Understanding fitness landscapes in morpho-evolution via local optima networks

Sarah L. Thomson, Léni K. Le Goff, Emma Hart +1

Morpho-evolution (ME) refers to the simultaneous optimisation of a robot's design and controller to maximise performance given a task and environment. Many genetic encodings have b…

cs.NE2024

Information flow and Laplacian dynamics on local optima networks

Hendrik Richter, Sarah L. Thomson

We propose a new way of looking at local optima networks (LONs). LONs represent fitness landscapes; the nodes are local optima, and the edges are search transitions between them. M…