17 citations · 67 across the 33 of their papers we have counts for
15 papers · 1 filter
Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space
Shibo Hao, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, DiJia Su +4
Large language models (LLMs) are typically constrained to reason in the language space, where they express the reasoning process through a chain-of-thought (CoT) to solve complex p…
Adaptive Decoding via Latent Preference Optimization
Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Ilia Kulikov, Ping Yu +4
During language model decoding, it is known that using higher temperature sampling gives more creative responses, while lower temperatures are more factually accurate. However, suc…
Self-Consistency Preference Optimization
Archiki Prasad, Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang +6
Self-alignment, whereby models learn to improve themselves without human annotation, is a rapidly growing research area. However, existing techniques often fail to improve complex…
Thinking LLMs: General Instruction Following with Thought Generation
Tianhao Wu, Janice Lan, Weizhe Yuan +3
LLMs are typically trained to answer user questions or follow instructions similarly to how human experts respond. However, in the standard alignment framework they lack the basic…
Source2Synth: Synthetic Data Generation and Curation Grounded in Real Data Sources
Alisia Lupidi, Carlos Gemmell, Nicola Cancedda +5
Synthetic data generation has recently emerged as a promising approach for enhancing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) without the need for expensive human annotatio…
Self-Taught Evaluators
Tianlu Wang, Ilia Kulikov, Olga Golovneva +7
Model-based evaluation is at the heart of successful model development -- as a reward model for training, and as a replacement for human evaluation. To train such evaluators, the s…
Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge
Tianhao Wu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva +5
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly surpassing human knowledge in many domains. While improving these models traditionally relies on costly human data, recent self-rewarding m…
Distilling System 2 into System 1
Ping Yu, Jing Xu, Jason Weston +1
Large language models (LLMs) can spend extra compute during inference to generate intermediate thoughts, which helps to produce better final responses. Since Chain-of-Thought (Wei…
Following Length Constraints in Instructions
Weizhe Yuan, Ilia Kulikov, Ping Yu +4
Aligned instruction following models can better fulfill user requests than their unaligned counterparts. However, it has been shown that there is a length bias in evaluation of suc…
Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Important
Olga Golovneva, Tianlu Wang, Jason Weston +1
The attention mechanism is a critical component of Large Language Models (LLMs) that allows tokens in a sequence to interact with each other, but is order-invariant. Incorporating…
Iterative Reasoning Preference Optimization
Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Weizhe Yuan, Kyunghyun Cho +3
Iterative preference optimization methods have recently been shown to perform well for general instruction tuning tasks, but typically make little improvement on reasoning tasks (Y…
TOOLVERIFIER: Generalization to New Tools via Self-Verification
Dheeraj Mekala, Jason Weston, Jack Lanchantin +4
Teaching language models to use tools is an important milestone towards building general assistants, but remains an open problem. While there has been significant progress on learn…
Branch-Train-MiX: Mixing Expert LLMs into a Mixture-of-Experts LLM
Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Olga Golovneva, Vasu Sharma +8
We investigate efficient methods for training Large Language Models (LLMs) to possess capabilities in multiple specialized domains, such as coding, math reasoning and world knowled…
Reverse Training to Nurse the Reversal Curse
Olga Golovneva, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Jason Weston +1
Large language models (LLMs) have a surprising failure: when trained on "A has a feature B", they do not generalize to "B is a feature of A", which is termed the Reversal Curse. Ev…
Self-Rewarding Language Models
Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho +4
We posit that to achieve superhuman agents, future models require superhuman feedback in order to provide an adequate training signal. Current approaches commonly train reward mode…