activity
20232025
most citedGPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark

27 citations · 35 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2025

Separate the Wheat from the Chaff: Winnowing Down Divergent Views in Retrieval Augmented Generation

Song Wang, Zihan Chen, Peng Wang +5

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge sources to address their limitations in accessing up-to-date or special…

cs.CL2024

Training Language Models to Win Debates with Self-Play Improves Judge Accuracy

Samuel Arnesen, David Rein, Julian Michael

We test the robustness of debate as a method of scalable oversight by training models to debate with data generated via self-play. In a long-context reading comprehension task, we…

cs.CL2024

Bias-Augmented Consistency Training Reduces Biased Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought

James Chua, Edward Rees, Hunar Batra +4

Chain-of-thought prompting (CoT) has the potential to improve the explainability of language model reasoning. But CoT can also systematically misrepresent the factors influencing m…

cs.AI2023★ 27 cited

GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark

David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland +5

We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality…

cs.AI2023★ 8 cited

Debate Helps Supervise Unreliable Experts

Julian Michael, Salsabila Mahdi, David Rein +4

As AI systems are used to answer more difficult questions and potentially help create new knowledge, judging the truthfulness of their outputs becomes more difficult and more impor…