activity
20232025
most citedPrivacy-Preserving Algorithmic Recourse

3 citations · 4 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.AI20251 cited

Who Judges the Judge? LLM Jury-on-Demand: Building Trustworthy LLM Evaluation Systems

Xiaochuan Li, Ke Wang, Girija Gouda +5

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integrated into high-stakes domains, there is a growing need for evaluation methods that are both scalable for real-time deployment and relia…

stat.ML2024

Sequential Harmful Shift Detection Without Labels

Salim I. Amoukou, Tom Bewley, Saumitra Mishra +3

We introduce a novel approach for detecting distribution shifts that negatively impact the performance of machine learning models in continuous production environments, which requi…

cs.CL2024

Interpretable LLM-based Table Question Answering

Giang Nguyen, Ivan Brugere, Shubham Sharma +3

Interpretability in Table Question Answering (Table QA) is critical, especially in high-stakes domains like finance and healthcare. While recent Table QA approaches based on Large…

cs.LG2024

Interpreting Language Reward Models via Contrastive Explanations

Junqi Jiang, Tom Bewley, Saumitra Mishra +2

Reward models (RMs) are a crucial component in the alignment of large language models' (LLMs) outputs with human values. RMs approximate human preferences over possible LLM respons…

cs.LG20233 cited

Privacy-Preserving Algorithmic Recourse

Sikha Pentyala, Shubham Sharma, Sanjay Kariyappa +2

When individuals are subject to adverse outcomes from machine learning models, providing a recourse path to help achieve a positive outcome is desirable. Recent work has shown that…