activity
20232026
most citedToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving

21 citations · 64 across the 50 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

56 papers

cs.CL2026

ScopeIF: Improving Scope-Aware Precise Instruction-Following in Large Language Models via Graded Reward Modeling

Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Xiaoying Ning +3

Precise instruction-following is a fundamental ability of large language models (LLMs), requiring their outputs to strictly satisfy objective constraints in input instructions. In…

cs.LG2026

RUBAS: Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning for Agent Safety

Xian Qi Loye, Qinglin Su, Zhexin Zhang +5

The evolution of LLMs into tool-enabled agents creates a new class of safety challenges associated with real-world execution rather than simple text generation. Existing alignment…

cs.CV2026

SynCred-Bench: Benchmarking Synthetic Credibility in AI-Generated Visual Misinformation

Junxiao Yang, Minghao Zhang, Xiaoce Wang +4

Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility. We introduce SYNCRE…

cs.AI2026

You Live More Than Once: Towards Hierarchical Skill Meta-Evolving

Xujun Li, Kehan Zheng, Mingyuan Zhao +7

Test-time skill evolving is regarded as a new paradigm for enhancing deployed agentic systems. Existing works mainly focus on hard-coded skill evolving strategies or parametric lea…

cs.LG2026

LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety

Junxiao Yang, Haoran Liu, Jinzhe Tu +9

Large language models (LLMs) often demonstrate strong safety performance in high-resource languages, yet exhibit severe vulnerabilities when queried in low-resource languages. We a…

cs.CL2026

HoWToBench: Holistic Evaluation for LLM's Capability in Human-level Writing using Tree of Writing

Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo +7

Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of exis…

cs.CL2026

IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation

Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang +5

Instruction-following is a foundational capability of large language models (LLMs), with its improvement hinging on scalable and accurate feedback from judge models. However, the r…

cs.AI2026

Survive at All Costs: Exploring LLM's Risky Behaviors under Survival Pressure

Yida Lu, Jianwei Fang, Xuyang Shao +7

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve from chatbots to agentic assistants, they are increasingly observed to exhibit risky behaviors when subjected to survival pressure, such as t…

cs.CL2026

RLAR: An Agentic Reward System for Multi-task Reinforcement Learning on Large Language Models

Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Bosi Wen +4

Large language model alignment via reinforcement learning depends critically on reward function quality. However, static, domain-specific reward models are often costly to train an…

cs.CL2026

RAVEL: Reasoning Agents for Validating and Evaluating LLM Text Synthesis

Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo +9

Large Language Models have evolved from single-round generators into long-horizon agents, capable of complex text synthesis scenarios. However, current evaluation frameworks lack t…

cs.AI2026

Grounding LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Embodied Actions

Bo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhou, Yuxuan Chen +3

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in scientific discovery but struggle to bridge the gap between theoretical reasoning and verifiable physical simulatio…

cs.CL2026

The Missing Half: Unveiling Training-time Implicit Safety Risks Beyond Deployment

Zhexin Zhang, Yida Lu, Junfeng Fang +8

Safety risks of AI models have been widely studied at deployment time, such as jailbreak attacks that elicit harmful outputs. In contrast, safety risks emerging during training rem…

cs.LG2025

Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization

Mingyu Su, Jian Guan, Yuxian Gu +2

Post-training methods, especially Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), play an important role in improving large language models' (LLMs) complex reasoning…

cs.CL2025

IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation

Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang +6

Instruction-following is a fundamental ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring their generated outputs to follow multiple constraints imposed in input instructions. Nume…

cs.CV2025

Glyph: Scaling Context Windows via Visual-Text Compression

Jiale Cheng, Yusen Liu, Xinyu Zhang +11

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on long-context modeling for tasks such as document understanding, code analysis, and multi-step reasoning. However, scaling context…

cs.LG2025

Data-Efficient RLVR via Off-Policy Influence Guidance

Erle Zhu, Dazhi Jiang, Yuan Wang +8

Data selection is a critical aspect of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Current data…

cs.CL2025

Think Socially via Cognitive Reasoning

Jinfeng Zhou, Zheyu Chen, Shuai Wang +4

LLMs trained for logical reasoning excel at step-by-step deduction to reach verifiable answers. However, this paradigm is ill-suited for navigating social situations, which induce…

cs.CL2025

Training Language Model to Critique for Better Refinement

Tianshu Yu, Chao Xiang, Mingchuan Yang +8

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable evaluation and critique capabilities, providing insightful feedback and identifying flaws in various tasks. However, limit…

cs.MM2025

ShieldVLM: Safeguarding the Multimodal Implicit Toxicity via Deliberative Reasoning with LVLMs

Shiyao Cui, Qinglin Zhang, Xuan Ouyang +6

Toxicity detection in multimodal text-image content faces growing challenges, especially with multimodal implicit toxicity, where each modality appears benign on its own but convey…

cs.CL2025

Be Careful When Fine-tuning On Open-Source LLMs: Your Fine-tuning Data Could Be Secretly Stolen!

Zhexin Zhang, Yuhao Sun, Junxiao Yang +4

Fine-tuning on open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) with proprietary data is now a standard practice for downstream developers to obtain task-specific LLMs. Surprisingly, we re…

cs.CL2025

How Should We Enhance the Safety of Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study

Zhexin Zhang, Xian Qi Loye, Victor Shea-Jay Huang +8

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on reasoning-intensive tasks such as mathematics and programming. However, their enhanced reasoning capabilities do n…

cs.AI2025

BARREL: Boundary-Aware Reasoning for Factual and Reliable LRMs

Junxiao Yang, Jinzhe Tu, Haoran Liu +9

Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown impressive capabilities in mathematical and logical reasoning. However, current LRMs rarely admit ignorance or respond w…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Crisp: Cognitive Restructuring of Negative Thoughts through Multi-turn Supportive Dialogues

Jinfeng Zhou, Yuxuan Chen, Jianing Yin +9

Cognitive Restructuring (CR) is a psychotherapeutic process aimed at identifying and restructuring an individual's negative thoughts, arising from mental health challenges, into mo…

cs.AI2025

StepMathAgent: A Step-Wise Agent for Evaluating Mathematical Processes through Tree-of-Error

Shu-Xun Yang, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang +3

Evaluating mathematical capabilities is critical for assessing the overall performance of large language models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation methods often focus solely on f…