activity
20242026
collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

6 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

Learning When Not to Learn: Risk-Sensitive Abstention in Bandits with Unbounded Rewards

Sarah Liaw, Benjamin Plaut

In high-stakes AI applications, even a single action can cause irreparable damage. However, nearly all of sequential decision-making theory assumes that all errors are recoverable…

cs.LG2026

Safety Training May Persist Through Helpfulness Optimization in LLM Agents

Benjamin Plaut

Safety post-training has been studied extensively in single-step "chat" settings where safety typically refers to refusing harmful requests. We study an "agentic" (i.e., multi-step…

cs.LG2026

YRC-Bench: A Benchmark for Learning to Coordinate with Experts

Mohamad H. Danesh, Nguyen X. Khanh, Tu Trinh +1

When deployed in the real world, AI agents will inevitably face challenges that exceed their individual capabilities. A critical component of AI safety is an agent's ability to rec…

cs.LG2025

Safe Learning Under Irreversible Dynamics via Asking for Help

Benjamin Plaut, Juan Liévano-Karim, Hanlin Zhu +1

Most learning algorithms with formal regret guarantees essentially rely on trying all possible behaviors, which is problematic when some errors cannot be recovered from. Instead, w…

cs.LG2025

Avoiding Catastrophe in Online Learning by Asking for Help

Benjamin Plaut, Hanlin Zhu, Stuart Russell

Most learning algorithms with formal regret guarantees assume that all mistakes are recoverable and essentially rely on trying all possible behaviors. This approach is problematic…

cs.LG2024

Getting By Goal Misgeneralization With a Little Help From a Mentor

Tu Trinh, Mohamad H. Danesh, Nguyen X. Khanh +1

While reinforcement learning (RL) agents often perform well during training, they can struggle with distribution shift in real-world deployments. One particularly severe risk of di…