25 citations · 25 across the 3 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Halu-J: Critique-Based Hallucination Judge
Binjie Wang, Steffi Chern, Ethan Chern +1
Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate non-factual content, known as hallucinations. Existing retrieval-augmented-based hallucination detection approaches typically addre…
BeHonest: Benchmarking Honesty in Large Language Models
Steffi Chern, Zhulin Hu, Yuqing Yang +5
Previous works on Large Language Models (LLMs) have mainly focused on evaluating their helpfulness or harmlessness. However, honesty, another crucial alignment criterion, has recei…
Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate
Steffi Chern, Ethan Chern, Graham Neubig +1
Despite the utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a wide range of tasks and scenarios, developing a method for reliably evaluating LLMs across varied contexts continues to…
Combating Adversarial Attacks with Multi-Agent Debate
Steffi Chern, Zhen Fan, Andy Liu
While state-of-the-art language models have achieved impressive results, they remain susceptible to inference-time adversarial attacks, such as adversarial prompts generated by red…
FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarios
I-Chun Chern, Steffi Chern, Shiqi Chen +6
The emergence of generative pre-trained models has facilitated the synthesis of high-quality text, but it has also posed challenges in identifying factual errors in the generated t…