activity
20072016
most citedSpreadsheet Errors: What We Know. What We Think We Can Do

110 citations · 229 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.SEShow all

6 papers · 1 filter

cs.SE2016★ 12 cited

What We Don't Know About Spreadsheet Errors Today: The Facts, Why We Don't Believe Them, and What We Need to Do

Ray Panko

Research on spreadsheet errors is substantial, compelling, and unanimous. It has three simple conclusions. The first is that spreadsheet errors are rare on a per-cell basis, but in…

cs.SE2010★ 14 cited

The Detection of Human Spreadsheet Errors by Humans versus Inspection (Auditing) Software

Salvatore Aurigemma, Raymond R. Panko

Previous spreadsheet inspection experiments have had human subjects look for seeded errors in spreadsheets. In this study, subjects attempted to find errors in human-developed spre…

cs.SE2008★ 8 cited

Revisiting the Panko-Halverson Taxonomy of Spreadsheet Errors

Raymond R. Panko

The purpose of this paper is to revisit the Panko-Halverson taxonomy of spreadsheet errors and suggest revisions. There are several reasons for doing so: First, the taxonomy has be…

cs.SE2008★ 25 cited

Sarbanes-Oxley: What About all the Spreadsheets?

Raymond R. Panko, Nicholas Ordway

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has finally forced corporations to examine the validity of their spreadsheets. They are beginning to understand the spreadsheet error literature, inc…

cs.SE2008★ 110 cited

Spreadsheet Errors: What We Know. What We Think We Can Do

Raymond R. Panko

Fifteen years of research studies have concluded unanimously that spreadsheet errors are both common and non-trivial. Now we must seek ways to reduce spreadsheet errors. Several ap…

cs.SE2007★ 17 cited

Recommended Practices for Spreadsheet Testing

Raymond R. Panko

This paper presents the authors recommended practices for spreadsheet testing. Documented spreadsheet error rates are unacceptable in corporations today. Although improvements are…