most citedAssessing test artifact quality -- A tertiary study

25 citations · 60 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.SE202414 cited

How good are my search strings? Reflections on using an existing review as a quasi-gold standard

Huynh Khanh Vi Tran, Jürgen Börstler, Nauman Bin Ali +1

Background: Systematic literature studies (SLS) have become a core research methodology in Evidence-based Software Engineering (EBSE). Search completeness, ie, finding all relevant…

cs.SE202425 cited

Assessing test artifact quality -- A tertiary study

Huynh Khanh Vi Tran, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Jürgen Börstler +1

Context: Modern software development increasingly relies on software testing for an ever more frequent delivery of high quality software. This puts high demands on the quality of t…

cs.SE20243 cited

Help Me to Understand this Commit! -- A Vision for Contextualized Code Reviews

Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Deepika Badampudi, Ricardo Britto +1

Background: Modern Code Review (MCR) is a key component for delivering high-quality software and sharing knowledge among developers. Effective reviews require an in-depth understan…

cs.SE202314 cited

Test-Case Quality -- Understanding Practitioners' Perspectives

Huynh Khanh Vi Tran, Nauman Bin Ali, Jürgen Börstler +1

Background: Test-case quality has always been one of the major concerns in software testing. To improve test-case quality, it is important to better understand how practitioners pe…

cs.SE20234 cited

Use and evaluation of simulation for software process education: a case study

Nauman bin Ali, Michael Unterkalmsteiner

Software Engineering is an applied discipline and concepts are difficult to grasp only at a theoretical level alone. In the context of a project management course, we introduced an…