1 citations · 1 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers · 1 filter
Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer
Katharina Deckenbach, Haritz Puerto, Jonas Geiping +1
The validity of AI safety evaluations depends on models behaving consistently across controlled and deployment settings. Prior work has identified test-time contextual cues, such a…
Teaching Pretrained Language Models to Think Deeper with Retrofitted Recurrence
Sean McLeish, Ang Li, John Kirchenbauer +7
Recent advances in depth-recurrent language models show that recurrence can decouple train-time compute and parameter count from test-time compute. In this work, we study how to co…
Rewiring Experts on the Fly:Continuous Rerouting for Better Online Adaptation in Mixture-of-Expert models
Guinan Su, Yanwu Yang, Li Shen +3
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models achieve efficient scaling through sparse expert activation, but often suffer from suboptimal routing decisions due to distribution shifts in deploym…
Answer Matching Outperforms Multiple Choice for Language Model Evaluation
Nikhil Chandak, Shashwat Goel, Ameya Prabhu +2
Multiple choice benchmarks have long been the workhorse of language model evaluation because grading multiple choice is objective and easy to automate. However, we show multiple ch…
GPTailor: Large Language Model Pruning Through Layer Cutting and Stitching
Guinan Su, Li Shen, Lu Yin +3
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. However, such impressive capability typically comes with a substantial mod…
RAG LLMs are Not Safer: A Safety Analysis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models
Bang An, Shiyue Zhang, Mark Dredze
Efforts to ensure the safety of large language models (LLMs) include safety fine-tuning, evaluation, and red teaming. However, despite the widespread use of the Retrieval-Augmented…