most citedEvaluation of software impact designed for biomedical research: Are we measuring what's meaningful?

2 citations · 7 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

q-bio.QM20241 cited

The microbiome science of composting and human excrement composting: a review

Jeff Meilander, J. Gregory Caporaso

Linear waste management systems are unsustainable and contribute to environmental degradation, economic inequity, and health disparities. Among the array of environmental challenge…

q-bio.QM20242 cited

Facilitating bootstrapped and rarefaction-based microbiome diversity analysis with q2-boots

Isaiah Raspet, Elizabeth Gehret, Chloe Herman +5

Background: We present q2-boots, a QIIME 2 plugin that facilitates bootstrapped and rarefaction-based microbiome diversity analysis. This plugin provides eight new actions that all…

q-bio.QM20242 cited

Assessing Engraftment Following Fecal Microbiota Transplant

Chloe Herman, Bridget M. Barker, Thais F. Bartelli +9

Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) is an FDA approved treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infections, and is being explored for other clinical applications, from alleviati…

cs.SE20232 cited

Evaluation of software impact designed for biomedical research: Are we measuring what's meaningful?

Awan Afiaz, Andrey Ivanov, John Chamberlin +24

Software is vital for the advancement of biology and medicine. Analysis of usage and impact metrics can help developers determine user and community engagement, justify additional…

q-bio.QM2023

Facilitating Bioinformatics Reproducibility

Christopher R. Keefe, Matthew R. Dillon, Chloe Herman +4

Study reproducibility is essential to corroborate, build on, and learn from the results of scientific research but is notoriously challenging in bioinformatics, which often involve…