6 citations · 11 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers
Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-Rationalization
Wei Liu, Zhiying Deng, Zhongyu Niu +4
An important line of research in the field of explainability is to extract a small subset of crucial rationales from the full input. The most widely used criterion for rationale ex…
Adversarial Attack for Explanation Robustness of Rationalization Models
Yuankai Zhang, Lingxiao Kong, Haozhao Wang +4
Rationalization models, which select a subset of input text as rationale-crucial for humans to understand and trust predictions-have recently emerged as a prominent research area i…
Enhancing the Rationale-Input Alignment for Self-explaining Rationalization
Wei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang +4
Rationalization empowers deep learning models with self-explaining capabilities through a cooperative game, where a generator selects a semantically consistent subset of the input…
Decoupled Rationalization with Asymmetric Learning Rates: A Flexible Lipschitz Restraint
Wei Liu, Jun Wang, Haozhao Wang +5
A self-explaining rationalization model is generally constructed by a cooperative game where a generator selects the most human-intelligible pieces from the input text as rationale…
MGR: Multi-generator Based Rationalization
Wei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang +4
Rationalization is to employ a generator and a predictor to construct a self-explaining NLP model in which the generator selects a subset of human-intelligible pieces of the input…
FR: Folded Rationalization with a Unified Encoder
Wei Liu, Haozhao Wang, Jun Wang +3
Conventional works generally employ a two-phase model in which a generator selects the most important pieces, followed by a predictor that makes predictions based on the selected p…