activity
20222025
most citedExploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models

12 citations · 50 across the 18 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.SEShow all

18 papers · 1 filter

cs.SE2025

Curiosity-Driven Testing for Sequential Decision-Making Process

Junda He, Zhou Yang, Jieke Shi +5

Sequential decision-making processes (SDPs) are fundamental for complex real-world challenges, such as autonomous driving, robotic control, and traffic management. While recent adv…

cs.SE2024★ 1 cited

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on Code Smell Detection

Beiqi Zhang, Peng Liang, Xin Zhou +5

Automated code smell detection faces persistent challenges due to the subjectivity of heuristic rules and the limited performance of traditional ML/DL models. While Large Language…

cs.SE2024★ 4 cited

Comparison of Static Application Security Testing Tools and Large Language Models for Repo-level Vulnerability Detection

Xin Zhou, Duc-Manh Tran, Thanh Le-Cong +5

Software vulnerabilities pose significant security challenges and potential risks to society, necessitating extensive efforts in automated vulnerability detection. There are two po…

cs.SE2024★ 3 cited

Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection and Repair: Literature Review and the Road Ahead

Xin Zhou, Sicong Cao, Xiaobing Sun +1

The significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have resulted in their widespread adoption across various tasks within Software Engineering (SE), including vulnerabili…

cs.SE2024★ 4 cited

Bridging Expert Knowledge with Deep Learning Techniques for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction

Xin Zhou, DongGyun Han, David Lo

Just-In-Time (JIT) defect prediction aims to automatically predict whether a commit is defective or not, and has been widely studied in recent years. In general, most studies can b…

cs.SE2024★ 1 cited

CodeUltraFeedback: An LLM-as-a-Judge Dataset for Aligning Large Language Models to Coding Preferences

Martin Weyssow, Aton Kamanda, Xin Zhou +1

Evaluating the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with user-defined coding preferences is a challenging endeavour that requires a deep assessment of LLMs' outputs. Existing…

cs.SE2024★ 4 cited

Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection: Emerging Results and Future Directions

Xin Zhou, Ting Zhang, David Lo

Previous learning-based vulnerability detection methods relied on either medium-sized pre-trained models or smaller neural networks from scratch. Recent advancements in Large Pre-T…

cs.SE2024★ 1 cited

Multi-LLM Collaboration + Data-Centric Innovation = 2x Better Vulnerability Repair

Xin Zhou, Kisub Kim, Bowen Xu +2

The advances of deep learning (DL) have paved the way for automatic software vulnerability repair approaches, which effectively learn the mapping from the vulnerable code to the fi…

cs.SE2023★ 2 cited

CCBERT: Self-Supervised Code Change Representation Learning

Xin Zhou, Bowen Xu, DongGyun Han +3

Numerous code changes are made by developers in their daily work, and a superior representation of code changes is desired for effective code change analysis. Recently, Hoang et al…

cs.SE2023★ 3 cited

The Devil is in the Tails: How Long-Tailed Code Distributions Impact Large Language Models

Xin Zhou, Kisub Kim, Bowen Xu +3

Learning-based techniques, especially advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) for code, have gained considerable popularity in various software engineering (SE) tasks. However, most…

cs.SE2023

How are We Detecting Inconsistent Method Names? An Empirical Study from Code Review Perspective

Kisub Kim, Xin Zhou, Dongsun Kim +6

Proper naming of methods can make program code easier to understand, and thus enhance software maintainability. Yet, developers may use inconsistent names due to poor communication…

cs.SE2023★ 12 cited

Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models

Martin Weyssow, Xin Zhou, Kisub Kim +2

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities to generate accurate code snippets given natural language intents in a zero-shot manner, i.e., without the need for…

cs.SE2023★ 9 cited

On the Usage of Continual Learning for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Pre-trained Language Models of Code

Martin Weyssow, Xin Zhou, Kisub Kim +2

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have become a prevalent technique in deep learning for code, utilizing a two-stage pre-training and fine-tuning procedure to acquire general know…

cs.SE2023

Generation-based Code Review Automation: How Far Are We?

Xin Zhou, Kisub Kim, Bowen Xu +3

Code review is an effective software quality assurance activity; however, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Thus, a number of generation-based automatic code review (ACR) a…

cs.SE2023★ 2 cited

PatchZero: Zero-Shot Automatic Patch Correctness Assessment

Xin Zhou, Bowen Xu, Kisub Kim +5

Automated Program Repair (APR) techniques have shown more and more promising results in fixing real-world bugs. Despite the effectiveness, APR techniques still face an overfitting…

cs.SE2023★ 4 cited

Prioritizing Speech Test Cases

Zhou Yang, Jieke Shi, Muhammad Hilmi Asyrofi +4

With the wide adoption of automated speech recognition (ASR) systems, it is increasingly important to test and improve ASR systems. However, collecting and executing speech test ca…

cs.SE2022

DexBERT: Effective, Task-Agnostic and Fine-grained Representation Learning of Android Bytecode

Tiezhu Sun, Kevin Allix, Kisub Kim +5

The automation of a large number of software engineering tasks is becoming possible thanks to Machine Learning (ML). Central to applying ML to software artifacts (like source or ex…

cs.SE2022

Answer Summarization for Technical Queries: Benchmark and New Approach

Yang Chengran, Bowen Xu, Ferdian Thung +8

Prior studies have demonstrated that approaches to generate an answer summary for a given technical query in Software Question and Answer (SQA) sites are desired. We find that exis…