62 citations · 169 across the 17 of their papers we have counts for
Showing 2026Show all
3 papers · 1 filter
cs.CL2026
Think-Probe-Respond: Improving Large Language Models as Judges of Research Idea Novelty
Tim Schopf, Tobias Schreieder, Akiko Aizawa
Automated novelty judgment can accelerate scientific discovery by enabling efficient evaluation, refinement, and comparison of research ideas. While large language models are incre…
cs.CL2026
Encoded but Not Routed: Explaining the Table-Chart Gap in Scientific Claim Verification
Sunisth Kumar, Xanh Ho, Tim Schopf +3
Multimodal LLMs are increasingly used to assist scientific peer review, where a core requirement is verifying whether claims in a paper are supported by its evidence. Prior work ha…
cs.CL2026
Is this Idea Novel? An Automated Benchmark for Judgment of Research Ideas
Tim Schopf, Michael Färber
Judging the novelty of research ideas is crucial for advancing science, enabling the identification of unexplored directions, and ensuring contributions meaningfully extend existin…